Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 72301 - 72310 of 77380 for judgment for u s.
Search results 72301 - 72310 of 77380 for judgment for u s.
State v. Christopher L. Combs
)(a). The probable cause hearing set forth in § 980.09(2)(a) “is a paper review of the re-examination report(s
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20655 - 2005-12-14
)(a). The probable cause hearing set forth in § 980.09(2)(a) “is a paper review of the re-examination report(s
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20655 - 2005-12-14
COURT OF APPEALS
custodian under s. 19.33 from whom, and the methods whereby, the public may obtain” public records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98478 - 2013-07-01
custodian under s. 19.33 from whom, and the methods whereby, the public may obtain” public records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98478 - 2013-07-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, “Given the findings of fact [the court has] just made, [the court] also find[s] that the petitioner has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725394 - 2023-11-07
, “Given the findings of fact [the court has] just made, [the court] also find[s] that the petitioner has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725394 - 2023-11-07
[PDF]
Grant County Department of Social Services v. Unified Board of Grant and Iowa Counties
. There was oral argument by Sheila S. Kelley. Respondent ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6245 - 2017-09-19
. There was oral argument by Sheila S. Kelley. Respondent ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6245 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Mary H.
, 2000. She later filed her brief, arguing that “even though Mary H.’s rights were terminated, Don H
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2183 - 2017-09-19
, 2000. She later filed her brief, arguing that “even though Mary H.’s rights were terminated, Don H
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2183 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI App 161
.2d 514 (Ct. App. 1989) (“[C]ases should be decided on the narrowest possible ground[s].”). I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34381 - 2014-09-15
.2d 514 (Ct. App. 1989) (“[C]ases should be decided on the narrowest possible ground[s].”). I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34381 - 2014-09-15
State v. Mary H.
brief, arguing that “even though Mary H.’s rights were terminated, Don H., her husband in an intact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2184 - 2005-03-31
brief, arguing that “even though Mary H.’s rights were terminated, Don H., her husband in an intact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2184 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
’ property had “caused the adjacent property owner[s] hardships,” including “[r]eduction in enjoyment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1119148 - 2026-05-19
’ property had “caused the adjacent property owner[s] hardships,” including “[r]eduction in enjoyment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1119148 - 2026-05-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of constitutional fact. State v. Kerr, 2018 WI 87, ¶18, 383 Wis. 2d 306, 913 N.W.2d 787, cert denied, 139 S. Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248344 - 2019-10-08
of constitutional fact. State v. Kerr, 2018 WI 87, ¶18, 383 Wis. 2d 306, 913 N.W.2d 787, cert denied, 139 S. Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248344 - 2019-10-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
adopted. 5 In his motion, Jackson writes that he obtained the detective’s statement “[s]ometime after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72670 - 2014-09-15
adopted. 5 In his motion, Jackson writes that he obtained the detective’s statement “[s]ometime after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72670 - 2014-09-15