Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 72361 - 72370 of 83052 for simple case.
Search results 72361 - 72370 of 83052 for simple case.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Based on our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=857223 - 2024-10-03
Based on our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=857223 - 2024-10-03
Susan Bauer v. Dawn Willison
that “the court into which the case is going on appeal,” that is, the circuit court, “would be the correct court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14378 - 2005-03-31
that “the court into which the case is going on appeal,” that is, the circuit court, “would be the correct court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14378 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21. We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133840 - 2015-01-25
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21. We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133840 - 2015-01-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1120460 - 2026-05-21
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1120460 - 2026-05-21
Michelle Frank v. James Fritz
dated May 13, 1997, this case was submitted to the court on the expedited appeals calendar. See Rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12375 - 2005-03-31
dated May 13, 1997, this case was submitted to the court on the expedited appeals calendar. See Rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12375 - 2005-03-31
Joseph Welhouse v. Ralph L. Boo
in Florence County. The dispute in this case involves a strip of land that runs along the boundary between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5577 - 2005-03-31
in Florence County. The dispute in this case involves a strip of land that runs along the boundary between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5577 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
broadly. That case explains that the circuit court has the inherent power to modify a sentence, but only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111457 - 2014-05-05
broadly. That case explains that the circuit court has the inherent power to modify a sentence, but only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111457 - 2014-05-05
COURT OF APPEALS
, the twenty-five-year age gap in this case, King’s abuse of his authority as a teacher and coach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31422 - 2008-01-07
, the twenty-five-year age gap in this case, King’s abuse of his authority as a teacher and coach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31422 - 2008-01-07
Francis Liu v. Mark Chao
drawn by the trial court. Id. After hearing the testimony in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9730 - 2005-03-31
drawn by the trial court. Id. After hearing the testimony in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9730 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the appeal from dismissal of the original action). In exceptional cases, we entertain moot questions. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138600 - 2015-03-30
the appeal from dismissal of the original action). In exceptional cases, we entertain moot questions. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138600 - 2015-03-30