Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7241 - 7250 of 68466 for did.

COURT OF APPEALS
outside a restaurant. He and an acquaintance looked at the vehicles but did not see any damage, so Wick
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33447 - 2008-07-22

COURT OF APPEALS
of their personal property into the house. The Accolas did not purchase the house from Fontana, nor was any formal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74815 - 2011-12-06

State v. Leonard A. Sarnowski
or more consecutive days” when one is “legally obligated” to do so. The State charged that Sarnowski did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7371 - 2005-03-31

Lincoln County v. Misty K.
of dangerousness, but did not require that at least five members of the jury agree on one theory in determining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2098 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Nicholas S. Radtke
that Roller's presence in the same room did not vitiate the voluntariness of the consent. After the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13747 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Dane County Department of Human Services v. Thomas B.M.
of the Life Science Church, which did not oppose public school attendance. However, they had created
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13767 - 2014-09-15

State v. Anthony W. Quattrochi
.[1] On appeal, Quattrochi argues that: (1) the officer did not have probable cause to arrest; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13271 - 2005-03-31

State v. Anthony W. Quattrochi
.[1] On appeal, Quattrochi argues that: (1) the officer did not have probable cause to arrest; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12783 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
court said the trial would begin after a break for lunch. After the lunch break, Schmeisser did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157113 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to five main issues.5 We address each in turn, ultimately concluding that the postconviction court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80704 - 2014-09-15