Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7241 - 7250 of 12454 for mr.
Search results 7241 - 7250 of 12454 for mr.
State v. Steve A. Johnson
representing Mr. Johnson in the trial court and on this appeal was also counsel for the defendant-appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13029 - 2005-03-31
representing Mr. Johnson in the trial court and on this appeal was also counsel for the defendant-appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13029 - 2005-03-31
Milwaukee County v. Edward S.
?” During the deliberations, the jury sent out one question: “Do we base Mr. S[.]’s competency on or off
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13987 - 2005-03-31
?” During the deliberations, the jury sent out one question: “Do we base Mr. S[.]’s competency on or off
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13987 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Christopher Holmes
was then asked: “And did Mr. Holmes understand those rights?” She replied: “I believe he did, yes.” ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15451 - 2017-09-21
was then asked: “And did Mr. Holmes understand those rights?” She replied: “I believe he did, yes.” ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15451 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
in the past, it saw no reason to think they would work in the future, and, “given everything I know about Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141395 - 2015-05-12
in the past, it saw no reason to think they would work in the future, and, “given everything I know about Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141395 - 2015-05-12
[PDF]
State v. Gary Cembrowski
to this court states, "When the court stated it would not accept a no-contest plea, Mr. Cembrowski changed his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12111 - 2017-09-21
to this court states, "When the court stated it would not accept a no-contest plea, Mr. Cembrowski changed his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12111 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by Mr. Simpson.” Additionally, the court determined that the interests of justice would be served
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112225 - 2017-09-21
by Mr. Simpson.” Additionally, the court determined that the interests of justice would be served
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112225 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Kris A. Westberg
Howard decided to arrest Westberg: I told Mr. Westberg that based upon my observations of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7525 - 2017-09-19
Howard decided to arrest Westberg: I told Mr. Westberg that based upon my observations of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7525 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2021AP297-CR 3 Mr. Nelis.” Sweet claimed that he would offer an alibi defense, and he separately
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=532632 - 2022-06-14
. No. 2021AP297-CR 3 Mr. Nelis.” Sweet claimed that he would offer an alibi defense, and he separately
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=532632 - 2022-06-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, as the circuit court noted, “Mr. Allen himself offered no testimony in support of what he didn’t know about
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=679950 - 2023-07-19
, as the circuit court noted, “Mr. Allen himself offered no testimony in support of what he didn’t know about
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=679950 - 2023-07-19
State v. Ronald Roy Peterson
found it incredible that Hartman used a separate entrance: "[T]he Court doesn't believe that Mr. Hartman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8876 - 2005-03-31
found it incredible that Hartman used a separate entrance: "[T]he Court doesn't believe that Mr. Hartman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8876 - 2005-03-31