Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7241 - 7250 of 12460 for mr.
Search results 7241 - 7250 of 12460 for mr.
[PDF]
State v. Joseph J.J.
)). (..continued) Joseph was “Mr. Perfect and this is the one little mistake he made and they're going to give him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10814 - 2017-09-20
)). (..continued) Joseph was “Mr. Perfect and this is the one little mistake he made and they're going to give him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10814 - 2017-09-20
State v. Christopher Holmes
: “And did Mr. Holmes understand those rights?” She replied: “I believe he did, yes.” ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15451 - 2005-03-31
: “And did Mr. Holmes understand those rights?” She replied: “I believe he did, yes.” ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15451 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
under the influence,” and “thus the court erred in finding Mr. Gasse refused chemical testing” under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=431956 - 2021-09-29
under the influence,” and “thus the court erred in finding Mr. Gasse refused chemical testing” under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=431956 - 2021-09-29
State v. Brian L. Paarmann
that there was no articulable suspicion of criminal activity in this case to justify the stop and frisk when Mr. Paarmann began
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8550 - 2005-03-31
that there was no articulable suspicion of criminal activity in this case to justify the stop and frisk when Mr. Paarmann began
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8550 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James L. Neeley
that as a casual [sic] comment and not a plea. I also need to inform you, Mr. Neeley, that you do have a right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13016 - 2017-09-21
that as a casual [sic] comment and not a plea. I also need to inform you, Mr. Neeley, that you do have a right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13016 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
an investigatory stop of Mr. Russell’s vehicle.” But the fallacy in this argument is that Vlietstra’s stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30941 - 2007-11-20
an investigatory stop of Mr. Russell’s vehicle.” But the fallacy in this argument is that Vlietstra’s stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30941 - 2007-11-20
Associated Bank v. Lawrence Pufall
.” The court also stated: Mr. Pufall through his testimony, really, just simply stated that he ignored his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4864 - 2005-03-31
.” The court also stated: Mr. Pufall through his testimony, really, just simply stated that he ignored his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4864 - 2005-03-31
George H. Frank, Jr. v. Doris M. Frank
was, it’s quite apparent to the Court that the testator intended that Mr. Frank pay fair market value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6461 - 2005-03-31
was, it’s quite apparent to the Court that the testator intended that Mr. Frank pay fair market value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6461 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Christopher Holmes
was then asked: “And did Mr. Holmes understand those rights?” She replied: “I believe he did, yes.” ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15451 - 2017-09-21
was then asked: “And did Mr. Holmes understand those rights?” She replied: “I believe he did, yes.” ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15451 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
actually had to physically shake the defendant, Mr. Pinkard, to wake him up. …. The narcotics
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36215 - 2014-09-15
actually had to physically shake the defendant, Mr. Pinkard, to wake him up. …. The narcotics
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36215 - 2014-09-15