Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7241 - 7250 of 74480 for public records.
Search results 7241 - 7250 of 74480 for public records.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, V. WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=844361 - 2024-09-04
, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, V. WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=844361 - 2024-09-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
decision or if it renders a decision not reasonably supported by the facts of record.” Id. In making
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185736 - 2017-09-21
decision or if it renders a decision not reasonably supported by the facts of record.” Id. In making
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185736 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
disciplinary investigation; and (3) Attorney Strizic held himself out to the public as a licensed lawyer even
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143347 - 2017-09-21
disciplinary investigation; and (3) Attorney Strizic held himself out to the public as a licensed lawyer even
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143347 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
) Attorney Strizic held himself out to the public as a licensed lawyer even though he did not have an Arizona
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143347 - 2015-06-18
) Attorney Strizic held himself out to the public as a licensed lawyer even though he did not have an Arizona
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143347 - 2015-06-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
and subsequent finding that his refusal was unreasonable. We affirm because it would thwart public policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33707 - 2014-09-15
and subsequent finding that his refusal was unreasonable. We affirm because it would thwart public policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33707 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
played two audio recordings for the jury. One was S.P.’s 911 call. The other was a recording made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82114 - 2012-05-07
played two audio recordings for the jury. One was S.P.’s 911 call. The other was a recording made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82114 - 2012-05-07
[PDF]
State v. Michael J. Muetz
[his] problem.” On the basis of that record, the court said, “protecting the public from him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12788 - 2017-09-21
[his] problem.” On the basis of that record, the court said, “protecting the public from him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12788 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Public Defender 735 N. Water St., Ste 912 Milwaukee, WI 53202-4116 Criminal Appeals Unit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256623 - 2020-03-12
Public Defender 735 N. Water St., Ste 912 Milwaukee, WI 53202-4116 Criminal Appeals Unit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256623 - 2020-03-12
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
independent review of the record as 1 All references
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93370 - 2014-09-15
independent review of the record as 1 All references
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93370 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205819 - 2017-12-14
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205819 - 2017-12-14