Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7251 - 7260 of 16449 for commenting.
Search results 7251 - 7260 of 16449 for commenting.
[PDF]
State v. Jeremy A. Heisz
were as follows: the circuit court’s comments at the June 18, 2003 sentencing hearing had eroded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7259 - 2017-09-20
were as follows: the circuit court’s comments at the June 18, 2003 sentencing hearing had eroded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7259 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
comments made during the sentencing hearing. See id., ¶40 (a new factor is a fact unknowingly overlooked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215697 - 2018-07-17
comments made during the sentencing hearing. See id., ¶40 (a new factor is a fact unknowingly overlooked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215697 - 2018-07-17
[PDF]
WI 59
. Stat. § 905.13 prohibits such an instruction or other comment by judge or counsel
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98994 - 2014-09-15
. Stat. § 905.13 prohibits such an instruction or other comment by judge or counsel
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98994 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
must explain general range for sentence imposed). The circuit court’s sentencing comments satisfy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38397 - 2014-09-15
must explain general range for sentence imposed). The circuit court’s sentencing comments satisfy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38397 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
, mental health evaluation, housing and employment programs. 2 Several of the court’s comments referred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30088 - 2014-09-15
, mental health evaluation, housing and employment programs. 2 Several of the court’s comments referred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30088 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that Thomas had prejudged the matter. We disagree. Nothing about this brief comment indicates prejudgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28592 - 2007-03-28
that Thomas had prejudged the matter. We disagree. Nothing about this brief comment indicates prejudgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28592 - 2007-03-28
State v. John A. Rupp
convictions and that the convictions at hand were for victimizing the elderly. The trial court also commented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2810 - 2005-03-31
convictions and that the convictions at hand were for victimizing the elderly. The trial court also commented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2810 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
in the circuit court’s comments is the notion that Debrah’s inheritance argument, while weak under Derr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31446 - 2014-09-15
in the circuit court’s comments is the notion that Debrah’s inheritance argument, while weak under Derr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31446 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Keith Banks
that these comments went beyond the stipulated evidence in the case that told the jury that the semen and sperm had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9525 - 2017-09-19
that these comments went beyond the stipulated evidence in the case that told the jury that the semen and sperm had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9525 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
claimed that the circuit court issued “comment stipulations” that all fees, costs, and surcharges were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217332 - 2018-08-03
claimed that the circuit court issued “comment stipulations” that all fees, costs, and surcharges were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217332 - 2018-08-03