Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7251 - 7260 of 30120 for consulta de causas.
Search results 7251 - 7260 of 30120 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
State v. Johnny L. Thomas
of Thomas in shackles, we conclude that the prejudice was de minimus because the encounter was inadvertent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13192 - 2017-09-21
of Thomas in shackles, we conclude that the prejudice was de minimus because the encounter was inadvertent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13192 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
review de novo. State v. Hess, 2010 WI 82, ¶19, 327 Wis. 2d 524, 785 N.W.2d 568. We conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113224 - 2014-06-03
review de novo. State v. Hess, 2010 WI 82, ¶19, 327 Wis. 2d 524, 785 N.W.2d 568. We conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113224 - 2014-06-03
State v. Terry L. Holloway
step is to “review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo.” Id. Here, there is no dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5627 - 2005-03-31
step is to “review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo.” Id. Here, there is no dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5627 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d 118, 765 N.W.2d 569. We review de novo whether the facts lead to reasonable suspicion. Id. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85108 - 2012-07-18
. 2d 118, 765 N.W.2d 569. We review de novo whether the facts lead to reasonable suspicion. Id. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85108 - 2012-07-18
[PDF]
Community Financial Services Center Corporation v. Carl Rucker
arguable merit is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State ex rel. Hansen v. Circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7325 - 2017-09-20
arguable merit is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State ex rel. Hansen v. Circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7325 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Robert J. Kendall, Jr.
is a matter of law this court reviews de novo. State v. Adams, 152 Wis.2d 68, 74, 447 N.W.2d 90, 92 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14529 - 2017-09-21
is a matter of law this court reviews de novo. State v. Adams, 152 Wis.2d 68, 74, 447 N.W.2d 90, 92 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14529 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Kenneth D. Metz v. Timothy H. Becker
reviews de novo. Atkinson v. Mentzel, 211 Wis. 2d 637, 638, 566 N.W.2d 158 (Ct. App. 1997). ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5337 - 2017-09-19
reviews de novo. Atkinson v. Mentzel, 211 Wis. 2d 637, 638, 566 N.W.2d 158 (Ct. App. 1997). ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5337 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Policemen Relief Association v. Linda L. Krueger
is de novo. See id. at 115-16, 334 N.W.2d at 582. In reviewing the record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11244 - 2017-09-19
is de novo. See id. at 115-16, 334 N.W.2d at 582. In reviewing the record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11244 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
statutes, based upon an undisputed set of facts, which are matters of law we review de novo. State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=455315 - 2021-11-24
statutes, based upon an undisputed set of facts, which are matters of law we review de novo. State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=455315 - 2021-11-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
subject matter jurisdiction is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Schroeder, 224 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=619564 - 2023-02-07
subject matter jurisdiction is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Schroeder, 224 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=619564 - 2023-02-07