Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7251 - 7260 of 68466 for did.

[PDF] Finance Service Corporation v. Harold E. Drees
because: (1) it did not consider whether prejudice resulted from his failure to timely serve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19833 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Michael L. Marks
consensual sexual contact and that when she asked him to stop, he did. In its rebuttal case, the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6610 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Shannon S. v. Jackson C.
)(a) were established. He asserts that clear and convincing evidence did not show Codi was conceived
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7035 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
for which the police did not have probable cause. We conclude that the police had reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131902 - 2014-12-22

[PDF] State v. Gregg R. Madden
, 448 N.W.2d at 267. We conclude, as did the trial court, that no such evidence exists in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14093 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, Dukic told the court he did not want any delay. The trial court explained that it could not guarantee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67815 - 2014-09-15

State v. Michael L. Marks
and Irene had consensual sexual contact and that when she asked him to stop, he did. In its rebuttal case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6610 - 2005-03-31

Finance Service Corporation v. Harold E. Drees
judgment because: (1) it did not consider whether prejudice resulted from his failure to timely serve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19833 - 2005-10-03

State v. Joseph C. Coles
be concurrent because the trial court did not expressly state that the sentence was consecutive to a “time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10346 - 2005-03-31

State v. Donald J. Buford
denying his postconviction motion. Buford claims: (1) he did not knowingly waive his right to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6924 - 2005-03-31