Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7251 - 7260 of 50036 for our.
Search results 7251 - 7260 of 50036 for our.
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140016 - 2015-04-20
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140016 - 2015-04-20
CA Blank Order
to bias. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106025 - 2013-12-26
to bias. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106025 - 2013-12-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. § 801.14(2) (2011-12). Our order, however, directed counsel to file, not serve, a response
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103198 - 2017-09-21
. § 801.14(2) (2011-12). Our order, however, directed counsel to file, not serve, a response
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103198 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=326140 - 2021-01-21
disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=326140 - 2021-01-21
State v. Romondo D. Seymour
slip op. (Ct. App. April 4, 1996). Our remand direction stated: “On remand, the State may elect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14773 - 2005-03-31
slip op. (Ct. App. April 4, 1996). Our remand direction stated: “On remand, the State may elect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14773 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105583 - 2013-12-16
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105583 - 2013-12-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Nash was advised of his right to respond and has failed to respond. Upon our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204991 - 2017-12-12
. Nash was advised of his right to respond and has failed to respond. Upon our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204991 - 2017-12-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that he is entitled to plea withdrawal. Based upon our review of the briefs and records, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502558 - 2022-04-06
that he is entitled to plea withdrawal. Based upon our review of the briefs and records, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502558 - 2022-04-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
; and whether the record would support any claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=616587 - 2023-02-01
; and whether the record would support any claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=616587 - 2023-02-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to challenge the legitimacy of the plea. Our review of the Record establishes that the plea colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865682 - 2024-10-23
to challenge the legitimacy of the plea. Our review of the Record establishes that the plea colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865682 - 2024-10-23