Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7251 - 7260 of 83758 for simple case search.
Search results 7251 - 7260 of 83758 for simple case search.
State v. Kimy E. Trotter
seized from her should have been suppressed because the warrant that served as the basis for the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13202 - 2005-03-31
seized from her should have been suppressed because the warrant that served as the basis for the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13202 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to a warrantless search. We conclude that the circuit court properly determined that the challenged evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211332 - 2018-04-19
to a warrantless search. We conclude that the circuit court properly determined that the challenged evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211332 - 2018-04-19
COURT OF APPEALS
to the search and their consent was not voluntary. We conclude Deane’s parents had actual authority to consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54641 - 2010-09-20
to the search and their consent was not voluntary. We conclude Deane’s parents had actual authority to consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54641 - 2010-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Jeremy M. Dahl
court denied his motion to suppress evidence collected during a warrantless search. On appeal, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26402 - 2017-09-21
court denied his motion to suppress evidence collected during a warrantless search. On appeal, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26402 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
to the search and their consent was not voluntary. We conclude Deane’s parents had actual authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54641 - 2014-09-15
to the search and their consent was not voluntary. We conclude Deane’s parents had actual authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54641 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jeremy M. Dahl
evidence collected during a warrantless search. On appeal, he challenges the trial court’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26402 - 2006-09-06
evidence collected during a warrantless search. On appeal, he challenges the trial court’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26402 - 2006-09-06
COURT OF APPEALS
his reason for the stop was invalidated, the search of Roberts’ home was not sufficiently attenuated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54341 - 2010-09-14
his reason for the stop was invalidated, the search of Roberts’ home was not sufficiently attenuated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54341 - 2010-09-14
[PDF]
NOTICE
was unreliable and hence his reason for the stop was invalidated, the search of Roberts’ home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54341 - 2014-09-15
was unreliable and hence his reason for the stop was invalidated, the search of Roberts’ home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54341 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
suppressed drug evidence because, he claims, police unlawfully searched his shoes during a field
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87110 - 2014-09-15
suppressed drug evidence because, he claims, police unlawfully searched his shoes during a field
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87110 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Fortune received a tip that he had drugs in his possession. Two agents searched Fortune’s home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158092 - 2017-09-21
Fortune received a tip that he had drugs in his possession. Two agents searched Fortune’s home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158092 - 2017-09-21