Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 72501 - 72510 of 84023 for simple case search.
Search results 72501 - 72510 of 84023 for simple case search.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
After this case was submitted for decision, Hard filed a “notice of appeal to supplement or amend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72693 - 2014-09-15
After this case was submitted for decision, Hard filed a “notice of appeal to supplement or amend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72693 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21. We reject Sanders’ argument
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91341 - 2013-01-08
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21. We reject Sanders’ argument
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91341 - 2013-01-08
[PDF]
State v. Nathaniel Jackson
id. at 834. Whether the facts in this case meet that standard is reviewed without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2241 - 2017-09-19
id. at 834. Whether the facts in this case meet that standard is reviewed without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2241 - 2017-09-19
State v. Barry D. Stamps
. State v. Harvey, 2002 WI 93, ¶49, 254 Wis. 2d 442, 647 N.W.2d 189. We are satisfied that is the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7256 - 2005-03-31
. State v. Harvey, 2002 WI 93, ¶49, 254 Wis. 2d 442, 647 N.W.2d 189. We are satisfied that is the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7256 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
WIS. STAT. § 974.06 may not be filed while a direct appeal of the same case is pending. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70924 - 2014-09-15
WIS. STAT. § 974.06 may not be filed while a direct appeal of the same case is pending. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70924 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the case and addresses the sufficiency of the evidence at Cole’s jury trial, counsel’s performance
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=421167 - 2021-09-08
of the case and addresses the sufficiency of the evidence at Cole’s jury trial, counsel’s performance
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=421167 - 2021-09-08
Lewis Altman, Jr. v. Gary R. McCaughtry
of a staff advocate, that the adjustment committee did not have jurisdiction to hear his case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14136 - 2005-03-31
of a staff advocate, that the adjustment committee did not have jurisdiction to hear his case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14136 - 2005-03-31
Supreme Court Pending Rules Petitions
cases involving state legislative redistricting, Court’s own motion 10/14/2002 03-04 In the Matter
/sc/pendscr/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25972 - 2006-07-17
cases involving state legislative redistricting, Court’s own motion 10/14/2002 03-04 In the Matter
/sc/pendscr/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25972 - 2006-07-17
[PDF]
Betty Jane Maher v. Peggy Jeanne Maher and Patricia Marie Majewski
, this case was placed on the expedited appeals calendar. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.17 (1999-2000). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5395 - 2017-09-19
, this case was placed on the expedited appeals calendar. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.17 (1999-2000). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5395 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Walter Rieckhoff
¶4 This case presents a question of law based upon an undisputed set of facts, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3201 - 2017-09-19
¶4 This case presents a question of law based upon an undisputed set of facts, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3201 - 2017-09-19