Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7261 - 7270 of 30120 for consulta de causas.
Search results 7261 - 7270 of 30120 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS
responsibility. These are questions of law that we review de novo. See Tammy W-G., 333 Wis. 2d 273, ¶16; Xerox
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73795 - 2011-11-15
responsibility. These are questions of law that we review de novo. See Tammy W-G., 333 Wis. 2d 273, ¶16; Xerox
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73795 - 2011-11-15
COURT OF APPEALS
421, 424, 563 N.W.2d 175 (Ct. App. 1997) (application of Escalona bar is reviewed de novo). ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44870 - 2009-12-21
421, 424, 563 N.W.2d 175 (Ct. App. 1997) (application of Escalona bar is reviewed de novo). ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44870 - 2009-12-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
we review de novo. State v. Tuescher, 226 Wis. 2d 465, 468, 595 N.W.2d 443 (Ct. App. 1999
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249636 - 2019-11-06
we review de novo. State v. Tuescher, 226 Wis. 2d 465, 468, 595 N.W.2d 443 (Ct. App. 1999
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249636 - 2019-11-06
Dennis E. Jones v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections
This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology employed by the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5303 - 2005-03-31
This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology employed by the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5303 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kiemonte Lamont King
of the constitutionality of the "stop and frisk" presents issues subject to de novo review. See State v. Richardson, 156
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10730 - 2005-03-31
of the constitutionality of the "stop and frisk" presents issues subject to de novo review. See State v. Richardson, 156
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10730 - 2005-03-31
County of Bayfield v. Michael Emil Sulla
is a question of law this court reviews de novo. Hutson v. State of Wis. Personnel Comm’n, 2003 WI 97, ¶31, 263
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19243 - 2005-08-08
is a question of law this court reviews de novo. Hutson v. State of Wis. Personnel Comm’n, 2003 WI 97, ¶31, 263
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19243 - 2005-08-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Romero-Georgana, 2014 WI 83
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=352433 - 2021-04-06
postconviction motion is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Romero-Georgana, 2014 WI 83
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=352433 - 2021-04-06
State v. Robert Garel
of law which we review de novo. State v. Abbott, 207 Wis.2d 624, 628, 558 N.W.2d 927, 928 (Ct. App. 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13659 - 2005-03-31
of law which we review de novo. State v. Abbott, 207 Wis.2d 624, 628, 558 N.W.2d 927, 928 (Ct. App. 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13659 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard A. Edwards
the arresting officer could have obtained a breath test instead. We decide the issue de novo, owing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15571 - 2005-03-31
the arresting officer could have obtained a breath test instead. We decide the issue de novo, owing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15571 - 2005-03-31
State v. Charles B. Bushong
is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Eesley, 225 Wis. 2d 248, 253-54, 591 N.W.2d 846 (1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5654 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Eesley, 225 Wis. 2d 248, 253-54, 591 N.W.2d 846 (1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5654 - 2005-03-31