Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7261 - 7270 of 63511 for records.
Search results 7261 - 7270 of 63511 for records.
[PDF]
State v. Paul T. Tatum
basis in the Record. 1 We disagree and affirm. 2 I. ¶2 Tatum was charged with taking money
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24813 - 2017-09-21
basis in the Record. 1 We disagree and affirm. 2 I. ¶2 Tatum was charged with taking money
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24813 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Leggett has responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176948 - 2017-09-21
. Leggett has responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176948 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
to respond to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132591 - 2015-01-12
to respond to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132591 - 2015-01-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. There is simply nothing in the record to support Sheedy’s assertion that he mailed a request for a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142621 - 2017-09-21
. There is simply nothing in the record to support Sheedy’s assertion that he mailed a request for a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142621 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and No. 2019AP418 2 record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=282373 - 2020-08-26
of the briefs and No. 2019AP418 2 record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=282373 - 2020-08-26
State v. Thomas J. Becker
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10493 - 2005-03-31
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10493 - 2005-03-31
James R. Marucha v. Emery Cipov
to a neighboring lot owner, James Marucha. Cipov argues that the record fails to support Marucha's claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14106 - 2005-03-31
to a neighboring lot owner, James Marucha. Cipov argues that the record fails to support Marucha's claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14106 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, but Thompson has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172301 - 2017-09-21
, but Thompson has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172301 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and Rule 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108136 - 2014-02-18
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and Rule 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108136 - 2014-02-18
State v. Paul R. Askew
years to nine years. Due to Askew’s minimal record, the circuit court sentenced him to probation. Two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13958 - 2005-03-31
years to nine years. Due to Askew’s minimal record, the circuit court sentenced him to probation. Two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13958 - 2005-03-31