Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 72601 - 72610 of 83052 for simple case.
Search results 72601 - 72610 of 83052 for simple case.
Susan Bauer v. Dawn Willison
that “the court into which the case is going on appeal,” that is, the circuit court, “would be the correct court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14378 - 2005-03-31
that “the court into which the case is going on appeal,” that is, the circuit court, “would be the correct court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14378 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21. We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133840 - 2015-01-25
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21. We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133840 - 2015-01-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1120460 - 2026-05-21
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1120460 - 2026-05-21
Michelle Frank v. James Fritz
dated May 13, 1997, this case was submitted to the court on the expedited appeals calendar. See Rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12375 - 2005-03-31
dated May 13, 1997, this case was submitted to the court on the expedited appeals calendar. See Rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12375 - 2005-03-31
Joseph Welhouse v. Ralph L. Boo
in Florence County. The dispute in this case involves a strip of land that runs along the boundary between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5577 - 2005-03-31
in Florence County. The dispute in this case involves a strip of land that runs along the boundary between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5577 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
broadly. That case explains that the circuit court has the inherent power to modify a sentence, but only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111457 - 2014-05-05
broadly. That case explains that the circuit court has the inherent power to modify a sentence, but only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111457 - 2014-05-05
COURT OF APPEALS
, 34 (1963). ¶5 In determining whether such facts are present in this case, we ask: under all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39571 - 2009-08-18
, 34 (1963). ¶5 In determining whether such facts are present in this case, we ask: under all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39571 - 2009-08-18
COURT OF APPEALS
, the twenty-five-year age gap in this case, King’s abuse of his authority as a teacher and coach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31422 - 2008-01-07
, the twenty-five-year age gap in this case, King’s abuse of his authority as a teacher and coach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31422 - 2008-01-07
Francis Liu v. Mark Chao
drawn by the trial court. Id. After hearing the testimony in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9730 - 2005-03-31
drawn by the trial court. Id. After hearing the testimony in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9730 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the appeal from dismissal of the original action). In exceptional cases, we entertain moot questions. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138600 - 2015-03-30
the appeal from dismissal of the original action). In exceptional cases, we entertain moot questions. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138600 - 2015-03-30