Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7271 - 7280 of 74519 for public records.

[PDF] NOTICE
and subsequent finding that his refusal was unreasonable. We affirm because it would thwart public policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33707 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
played two audio recordings for the jury. One was S.P.’s 911 call. The other was a recording made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82114 - 2012-05-07

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
decision or if it renders a decision not reasonably supported by the facts of record.” Id. In making
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185736 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
policy violates Wisconsin’s public records law? Does Wis. Stat. § 19.70 require the DOJ to correct
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186424 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] SC Table of Pending Cases - Added decision in 2014AP2813-CR, 2015AP207 and 2016AP923-W
policy violates Wisconsin’s public records law? Does Wis. Stat. § 19.70 require the DOJ to correct
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187327 - 2017-09-21

State v. Quintin D. L'Minggio
discretion to do. ¶15 As to protection of the public, the trial court alluded to L’Minggio’s long record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3973 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Quintin D. L'Minggio
past criminal record, placed undue weight on the fact that he was on parole at the time of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3973 - 2017-09-20

WI App 76 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP2689-CR Complete Title...
, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Paul G. LaZotte, state public defender, of Madison. Respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83756 - 2013-04-29

[PDF] WI APP 76
public defender, of Madison. Respondent ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the plaintiff-respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83756 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Gerald Breen v. David J. Winkel
that the arbitration award does not constitute a manifest disregard of the law or violate strong public policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9740 - 2017-09-19