Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7271 - 7280 of 21492 for warrants.
Search results 7271 - 7280 of 21492 for warrants.
State v. Paul W. Schnelz
sufficient to warrant a reasonable person to conclude that the defendant has committed, or is in the process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11214 - 2005-03-31
sufficient to warrant a reasonable person to conclude that the defendant has committed, or is in the process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11214 - 2005-03-31
State v. Samuel J.G.
of juvenile jurisdiction was not warranted. The State argues that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10742 - 2005-03-31
of juvenile jurisdiction was not warranted. The State argues that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10742 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
degree of confidence warranting application of the procedural bar.2 For all the foregoing reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=873996 - 2024-11-12
degree of confidence warranting application of the procedural bar.2 For all the foregoing reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=873996 - 2024-11-12
CA Blank Order
of the circumstances, a reasonably prudent officer would be warranted in the belief that the suspect might be armed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103211 - 2013-10-16
of the circumstances, a reasonably prudent officer would be warranted in the belief that the suspect might be armed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103211 - 2013-10-16
State v. Richard Payette
and took a bag of marijuana from his coat pocket, without a search warrant. Payette contends that Eick
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2207 - 2005-03-31
and took a bag of marijuana from his coat pocket, without a search warrant. Payette contends that Eick
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2207 - 2005-03-31
State v. Alexander Grubor
, whether the basis for the mistrial request is sufficiently prejudicial to warrant a new trial. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4237 - 2005-03-31
, whether the basis for the mistrial request is sufficiently prejudicial to warrant a new trial. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4237 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
. 2d at 189-90. Further, we are not persuaded that certification to the supreme court is warranted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122989 - 2014-10-07
. 2d at 189-90. Further, we are not persuaded that certification to the supreme court is warranted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122989 - 2014-10-07
COURT OF APPEALS
concerning a well-established rule of appellate practice did not warrant relief under § 806.07(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29755 - 2007-07-18
concerning a well-established rule of appellate practice did not warrant relief under § 806.07(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29755 - 2007-07-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant [the] intrusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131706 - 2017-09-21
which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant [the] intrusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131706 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
and not the exception and that restitution should be ordered whenever warranted.” State v. Madlock, 230 Wis. 2d 324
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102338 - 2013-09-25
and not the exception and that restitution should be ordered whenever warranted.” State v. Madlock, 230 Wis. 2d 324
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102338 - 2013-09-25