Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7281 - 7290 of 30108 for consulta de causas.
Search results 7281 - 7290 of 30108 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS
a given set of facts constitutes reasonable suspicion is a question of law for our de novo review. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29097 - 2007-05-16
a given set of facts constitutes reasonable suspicion is a question of law for our de novo review. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29097 - 2007-05-16
State v. Oscar Jasper
of the proper venue for an action is a question of law, which we review de novo. Irby v. Young, 139 Wis. 2d 279
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2824 - 2005-03-31
of the proper venue for an action is a question of law, which we review de novo. Irby v. Young, 139 Wis. 2d 279
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2824 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
July 2006 Table of Unpublished Opinions
2005AP002994 CR State v. Earl J. De Cloux 06-13-2006 Affirmed 2005AP003032 CR State v. Dean A. Hermann 06
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26183 - 2017-09-21
2005AP002994 CR State v. Earl J. De Cloux 06-13-2006 Affirmed 2005AP003032 CR State v. Dean A. Hermann 06
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26183 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
of constitutional principles to the facts is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶8 Temporarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33826 - 2014-09-15
of constitutional principles to the facts is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶8 Temporarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33826 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“The constitutionality of a statutory scheme is a question of law that we review de novo.” See State v. Ninham, 2011
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=127949 - 2017-09-21
“The constitutionality of a statutory scheme is a question of law that we review de novo.” See State v. Ninham, 2011
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=127949 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
presents a constitutional issue that we review de novo. See id., ¶9. We agree with the postconviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=464048 - 2021-12-14
presents a constitutional issue that we review de novo. See id., ¶9. We agree with the postconviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=464048 - 2021-12-14
[PDF]
NOTICE
on grounds of newly-discovered evidence is a constitutional question which we review de novo.” Id. ¶8 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26786 - 2014-09-15
on grounds of newly-discovered evidence is a constitutional question which we review de novo.” Id. ¶8 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26786 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Stanley E. Young
is a question of law; therefore, our review is de novo. State v. Ruesch, 214 Wis. 2d 548, 552, 571 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3355 - 2017-09-19
is a question of law; therefore, our review is de novo. State v. Ruesch, 214 Wis. 2d 548, 552, 571 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3355 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
from filing a successive postconviction motion is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=717850 - 2023-10-24
from filing a successive postconviction motion is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=717850 - 2023-10-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
require ten days within which a defendant may seek de novo review, before the court commissioner’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258847 - 2020-04-28
require ten days within which a defendant may seek de novo review, before the court commissioner’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258847 - 2020-04-28