Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7281 - 7290 of 15546 for fee.
Search results 7281 - 7290 of 15546 for fee.
COURT OF APPEALS
for ticket exchange fees, and $615.68 for prepaid hotel fees for the days they missed due to the change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=126112 - 2014-11-05
for ticket exchange fees, and $615.68 for prepaid hotel fees for the days they missed due to the change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=126112 - 2014-11-05
[PDF]
Frontsheet
and in which she charged a client for legal fees even though she did not perform the work. She also failed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261913 - 2020-05-28
and in which she charged a client for legal fees even though she did not perform the work. She also failed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261913 - 2020-05-28
COURT OF APPEALS
have received from us minus the $500.00 retainer fee as stated in your previous email,” totaling $1,470
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63617 - 2011-05-04
have received from us minus the $500.00 retainer fee as stated in your previous email,” totaling $1,470
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63617 - 2011-05-04
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Lyle Paul Schaller
the client would not be able to see how the client's paid fee was applied; · Attorney Schaller would
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25072 - 2006-05-04
the client would not be able to see how the client's paid fee was applied; · Attorney Schaller would
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25072 - 2006-05-04
Frontsheet
. A $50 witness fee check was issued to Attorney Harris with the subpoena. There is no dispute
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46713 - 2010-02-03
. A $50 witness fee check was issued to Attorney Harris with the subpoena. There is no dispute
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46713 - 2010-02-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the money that you have received from us minus the $500.00 retainer fee as stated in your previous email
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63617 - 2014-09-15
of the money that you have received from us minus the $500.00 retainer fee as stated in your previous email
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63617 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI 9
former wife subpoenaed Attorney Harris to testify at the post- divorce hearing. A $50 witness fee check
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46713 - 2014-09-15
former wife subpoenaed Attorney Harris to testify at the post- divorce hearing. A $50 witness fee check
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46713 - 2014-09-15
Tamara R. DeVares v. Barney W. DeVares
have to pay fees for that up front and I think it is simply unreasonable for him to request those kinds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14722 - 2005-03-31
have to pay fees for that up front and I think it is simply unreasonable for him to request those kinds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14722 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
—“if determined worthy by counsel, are often taken on a contingency fee basis, which does not preclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=734042 - 2023-11-29
—“if determined worthy by counsel, are often taken on a contingency fee basis, which does not preclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=734042 - 2023-11-29
State v. Michael G. Kachelski
was not entered voluntarily because: (1) his trial counsel had a conflict of interest related to the flat-fee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12451 - 2005-03-31
was not entered voluntarily because: (1) his trial counsel had a conflict of interest related to the flat-fee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12451 - 2005-03-31