Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7281 - 7290 of 69076 for he.
Search results 7281 - 7290 of 69076 for he.
State v. David Vigil
conviction, he should be granted a new trial because the jury failed to reach a unanimous verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7435 - 2005-03-31
conviction, he should be granted a new trial because the jury failed to reach a unanimous verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7435 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argues that Garrett did not sufficiently prove that he was prejudiced. We agree and reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289121 - 2020-09-23
argues that Garrett did not sufficiently prove that he was prejudiced. We agree and reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289121 - 2020-09-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
arguing that he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel. After independently reviewing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102706 - 2017-09-21
arguing that he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel. After independently reviewing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102706 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
room of her house when Carter “came in the room, and then all [of a] sudden he started talking about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158147 - 2017-09-21
room of her house when Carter “came in the room, and then all [of a] sudden he started talking about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158147 - 2017-09-21
State v. Michael Bartz
on the grounds that the trial court erred in refusing to give a lesser-included offense instruction. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9572 - 2005-03-31
on the grounds that the trial court erred in refusing to give a lesser-included offense instruction. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9572 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
… a [minimum] initial incarceration” and that “at no time was [Thompson] informed that he faced a minimum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57070 - 2010-11-23
… a [minimum] initial incarceration” and that “at no time was [Thompson] informed that he faced a minimum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57070 - 2010-11-23
COURT OF APPEALS
for resentencing. He contends that the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion when it relied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93385 - 2013-04-29
for resentencing. He contends that the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion when it relied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93385 - 2013-04-29
State v. Charles R. Wincek
), Stats., and ordered him to pay $4,501.37 in restitution to a homeowner for whom he had agreed to perform
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11804 - 2005-03-31
), Stats., and ordered him to pay $4,501.37 in restitution to a homeowner for whom he had agreed to perform
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11804 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to suppress his statements to police, claiming that he confessed involuntarily when considered in the totality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31132 - 2007-12-10
to suppress his statements to police, claiming that he confessed involuntarily when considered in the totality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31132 - 2007-12-10
[PDF]
State v. Cornelius F.
is denied due process if he or she is in fact treated unfairly. Cornelius cannot meet this standard. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5915 - 2017-09-19
is denied due process if he or she is in fact treated unfairly. Cornelius cannot meet this standard. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5915 - 2017-09-19