Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 72841 - 72850 of 84045 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 72841 - 72850 of 84045 for simple case search/1000.
Supreme Court Pending Rules Petitions
cases involving state legislative redistricting, Court’s own motion 10/14/2002 03-04 In the Matter
/sc/pendscr/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25972 - 2006-07-17
cases involving state legislative redistricting, Court’s own motion 10/14/2002 03-04 In the Matter
/sc/pendscr/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25972 - 2006-07-17
State v. Gary L. Loppnow
the date of the arrest in this case.[2] The trial court denied the motion. Following a trial to the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15515 - 2005-03-31
the date of the arrest in this case.[2] The trial court denied the motion. Following a trial to the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15515 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Nathaniel Jackson
id. at 834. Whether the facts in this case meet that standard is reviewed without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2241 - 2017-09-19
id. at 834. Whether the facts in this case meet that standard is reviewed without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2241 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Louis J. Ferris v. Ex-Chancellor Judith L. Kuipers
this case. The issue is whether the circuit court properly granted summary judgment in favor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7040 - 2017-09-20
this case. The issue is whether the circuit court properly granted summary judgment in favor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7040 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). In this WIS. STAT. ch. 51 case, L.F.-G. appeals from
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213231 - 2018-05-30
purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). In this WIS. STAT. ch. 51 case, L.F.-G. appeals from
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213231 - 2018-05-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and was not unduly harsh, given the circumstances of the case. Upon the foregoing, IT IS ORDERED
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823447 - 2024-07-09
and was not unduly harsh, given the circumstances of the case. Upon the foregoing, IT IS ORDERED
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823447 - 2024-07-09
CA Blank Order
multiplicitous. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112084 - 2014-05-13
multiplicitous. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112084 - 2014-05-13
COURT OF APPEALS
. The error leading to resentencing was newly created by recent case law and was minor and technical in nature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41709 - 2009-09-30
. The error leading to resentencing was newly created by recent case law and was minor and technical in nature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41709 - 2009-09-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
) in the case and uncharged conduct (attempted burglary of a building or dwelling and burglary of a building
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=949285 - 2025-05-07
) in the case and uncharged conduct (attempted burglary of a building or dwelling and burglary of a building
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=949285 - 2025-05-07
State v. Phillip T. Wonderly
. ¶6 Thus, several significant constitutional violations occurred in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15738 - 2005-03-31
. ¶6 Thus, several significant constitutional violations occurred in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15738 - 2005-03-31