Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7291 - 7300 of 16449 for commentating.
Search results 7291 - 7300 of 16449 for commentating.
State v. Daniel H. Frasch
that the meaning of its original comment at sentencing was that Frasch should not receive a lengthy prison sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10271 - 2005-03-31
that the meaning of its original comment at sentencing was that Frasch should not receive a lengthy prison sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10271 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert W. Miller
been revoked. These succinct comments make manifest that Miller was denied Huber law privileges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2409 - 2017-09-19
been revoked. These succinct comments make manifest that Miller was denied Huber law privileges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2409 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to child pornography with its comment. Rather, it was referring to adult pornography, which Wyman
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163905 - 2017-09-21
to child pornography with its comment. Rather, it was referring to adult pornography, which Wyman
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163905 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the crime.” The court’s comments regarding the July 11, 2020 incident and the statements Wasley made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=484766 - 2022-02-17
the crime.” The court’s comments regarding the July 11, 2020 incident and the statements Wasley made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=484766 - 2022-02-17
[PDF]
NOTICE
that the State commented on Mendoza-Medina’s choice not to testify in his own behalf. ¶8 At the close
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35378 - 2014-09-15
that the State commented on Mendoza-Medina’s choice not to testify in his own behalf. ¶8 At the close
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35378 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The circuit court’s sentencing comments show that it considered the facts of this case in accord
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=330949 - 2021-02-02
. The circuit court’s sentencing comments show that it considered the facts of this case in accord
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=330949 - 2021-02-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court’s comments is that it was not attributing particular quotes to Smith but was simply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91909 - 2014-09-15
of the circuit court’s comments is that it was not attributing particular quotes to Smith but was simply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91909 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s comments in this case reflect its consideration of Przybylski’s record. Unlike the Martin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65191 - 2014-09-15
court’s comments in this case reflect its consideration of Przybylski’s record. Unlike the Martin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65191 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
commented that Willa’s statement was unsworn and unnotarized, so Leichman obtained a sworn and notarized
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211234 - 2018-04-13
commented that Willa’s statement was unsworn and unnotarized, so Leichman obtained a sworn and notarized
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211234 - 2018-04-13
State v. D.L.S.
unnecessary attention to the comments. ¶9 In order to succeed on a claim of ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6125 - 2005-03-31
unnecessary attention to the comments. ¶9 In order to succeed on a claim of ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6125 - 2005-03-31