Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7291 - 7300 of 29969 for consulta de causas.
Search results 7291 - 7300 of 29969 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for effective assistance is ultimately a legal determination that this court decides de novo. Id. We need
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=674790 - 2023-07-06
for effective assistance is ultimately a legal determination that this court decides de novo. Id. We need
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=674790 - 2023-07-06
[PDF]
State v. Marika W.
an issue of law that we review de novo but with deference to the trial court’s observations because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5961 - 2017-09-19
an issue of law that we review de novo but with deference to the trial court’s observations because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5961 - 2017-09-19
John E. Isom v. Jeffrey Endicott
is available to the petitioner is a question of law which is reviewed de novo. Id. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26297 - 2006-08-28
is available to the petitioner is a question of law which is reviewed de novo. Id. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26297 - 2006-08-28
COURT OF APPEALS
“Whether to retroactively apply the holding of a case is a question of law that we decide de novo.” State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29857 - 2007-09-09
“Whether to retroactively apply the holding of a case is a question of law that we decide de novo.” State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29857 - 2007-09-09
State v. Pierre A. LaForte
to de novo review. State v. Drexler, 199 Wis.2d 128, 133, 544 N.W.2d 903, 905 (Ct. App. 1995). Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11000 - 2005-03-31
to de novo review. State v. Drexler, 199 Wis.2d 128, 133, 544 N.W.2d 903, 905 (Ct. App. 1995). Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11000 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 15, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
, 2001 WI 25, ¶24, 241 Wis. 2d 804, 623 N.W.2d 751. We review a decision granting summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28457 - 2007-03-14
, 2001 WI 25, ¶24, 241 Wis. 2d 804, 623 N.W.2d 751. We review a decision granting summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28457 - 2007-03-14
CA Blank Order
court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, and we apply the same methodology employed by the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102956 - 2013-10-15
court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, and we apply the same methodology employed by the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102956 - 2013-10-15
State v. Mario D. Harrell
of review when reviewing cases involving a question of law is de novo. State v. Zimmerman, 185 Wis. 2d 549
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5198 - 2005-03-31
of review when reviewing cases involving a question of law is de novo. State v. Zimmerman, 185 Wis. 2d 549
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5198 - 2005-03-31
Kathy Davis v. Jodine Deppisch
adjustment committee is de novo and is limited to the record created before the committee. State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21463 - 2006-02-21
adjustment committee is de novo and is limited to the record created before the committee. State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21463 - 2006-02-21
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court’s findings of historical fact under the clearly erroneous standard, and second, we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69508 - 2011-08-16
the circuit court’s findings of historical fact under the clearly erroneous standard, and second, we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69508 - 2011-08-16