Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7291 - 7300 of 24568 for extending.
Search results 7291 - 7300 of 24568 for extending.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
years of initial incarceration and three years of extended supervision for the burglary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91312 - 2014-09-15
years of initial incarceration and three years of extended supervision for the burglary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91312 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to a total of three and one-half years’ initial confinement and two years’ extended supervision. The court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234056 - 2019-02-06
to a total of three and one-half years’ initial confinement and two years’ extended supervision. The court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234056 - 2019-02-06
[PDF]
Kenosha County Department of Human Services v. Lucille S.
23, 1997, and extended and revised every year thereafter. As a result of these dispositional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3920 - 2017-09-20
23, 1997, and extended and revised every year thereafter. As a result of these dispositional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3920 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
, thus extending the proceedings beyond the statutory time limits. We conclude that the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36121 - 2009-04-08
, thus extending the proceedings beyond the statutory time limits. We conclude that the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36121 - 2009-04-08
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 19, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
-month period of confinement followed by a twelve-month period of extended supervision. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27498 - 2006-12-18
-month period of confinement followed by a twelve-month period of extended supervision. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27498 - 2006-12-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
interviews. Accordingly, we reject the no-merit report, dismiss this appeal without prejudice, and extend
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=883007 - 2024-11-26
interviews. Accordingly, we reject the no-merit report, dismiss this appeal without prejudice, and extend
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=883007 - 2024-11-26
CA Blank Order
of imprisonment, bifurcated as eighteen years of initial confinement and seven years of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98465 - 2013-06-20
of imprisonment, bifurcated as eighteen years of initial confinement and seven years of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98465 - 2013-06-20
Frederick N. Spence v. Marianne A. Cooke
in a habeas proceeding. See id. This threshold requirement has been extended to decisions of prison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15080 - 2005-03-31
in a habeas proceeding. See id. This threshold requirement has been extended to decisions of prison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15080 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
interviews. Accordingly, we reject the no-merit report, dismiss this appeal without prejudice, and extend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=883007 - 2024-11-26
interviews. Accordingly, we reject the no-merit report, dismiss this appeal without prejudice, and extend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=883007 - 2024-11-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and that the court convert her remaining confinement time to extended supervision. ¶6 Upon reviewing the proposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980009 - 2025-07-09
and that the court convert her remaining confinement time to extended supervision. ¶6 Upon reviewing the proposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980009 - 2025-07-09

