Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7291 - 7300 of 67987 for law.

City of Chilton v. Michael D. Dessart
, the resultant breath test was not administered in accordance with the law. Dessart claims that, as a result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6772 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Wisconsin Association of Legal Administrators Correspondence
May it please the Court, my name is Robert Miller of the Murphy Desmond S.C. law firm. As our
/scrules/docs/0604walac.pdf - 2024-04-02

[PDF] Supreme Court Rule petition 13-14 - Comments from Attorney Gary L. Bakke
involved in family law for my entire 49 years as a lawyer. Over the years I have represented thousands
/supreme/docs/1314commentsbakke.pdf - 2014-02-13

[PDF] Famous Cases of the Wisconsin Supreme Court - Gillespie v. Palmer and others
, Section 1 of the Wisconsin Constitution.* The Legislature in 1849 passed a law allowing black men
/courts/supreme/docs/famouscases06.pdf - 2009-11-17

[PDF] WI 14
, University of Wisconsin Law School, filed a rule petition asking the court to amend Supreme Court Rule (SCR
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254087 - 2020-02-12

[PDF] NOTICE
previously held that a post-sentencing change in the law is not a new factor for purposes of sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55206 - 2014-09-15

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. James G. Wiard
: In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against James G. Wiard, Attorney at Law: Office of Lawyer Regulation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16698 - 2005-03-31

Michael S. Elkins v. Grace Brown
dismissing his mandamus action under the open records law. We affirm. ΒΆ2 Elkins made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24563 - 2006-03-22

[PDF] State v. Everett L.O.
King, Jr. Blvd. Madison, WI 53709 Patrick J. Stangl Stangl Law Office 6441 Enterprise Lane
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11780 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
. The supreme court has previously held that a post-sentencing change in the law is not a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55206 - 2010-10-04