Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7291 - 7300 of 50071 for our.
Search results 7291 - 7300 of 50071 for our.
[PDF]
Kathleen Jensen v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund
, David McPherson, seeks clarification of our opinion to make clear that on remand the plaintiffs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17558 - 2017-09-21
, David McPherson, seeks clarification of our opinion to make clear that on remand the plaintiffs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17558 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that he is entitled to plea withdrawal. Based upon our review of the briefs and records, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502558 - 2022-04-06
that he is entitled to plea withdrawal. Based upon our review of the briefs and records, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502558 - 2022-04-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that supports the conviction, including Holloway’s statement to the police implicating himself. Our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=276818 - 2020-08-11
that supports the conviction, including Holloway’s statement to the police implicating himself. Our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=276818 - 2020-08-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to challenge the legitimacy of the plea. Our review of the Record establishes that the plea colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865682 - 2024-10-23
to challenge the legitimacy of the plea. Our review of the Record establishes that the plea colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865682 - 2024-10-23
State v. Thomas Sparks
under our implied consent law. State v. Bunders, 68 Wis.2d 129, 133, 227 N.W.2d 727, 730 (1975
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8624 - 2005-03-31
under our implied consent law. State v. Bunders, 68 Wis.2d 129, 133, 227 N.W.2d 727, 730 (1975
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8624 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
consideration of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and Rule
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102127 - 2013-09-16
consideration of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and Rule
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102127 - 2013-09-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181900 - 2017-09-21
is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181900 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=472186 - 2022-01-13
an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=472186 - 2022-01-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, but she has not filed a response. Upon our independent review of the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249327 - 2019-10-29
, but she has not filed a response. Upon our independent review of the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249327 - 2019-10-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for postconviction relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173685 - 2017-09-21
for postconviction relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173685 - 2017-09-21