Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 72951 - 72960 of 82626 for simple case.
Search results 72951 - 72960 of 82626 for simple case.
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143207 - 2015-06-14
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143207 - 2015-06-14
State v. Torrence C. Borum
recounted the history of the case, explaining that the court had repeatedly discussed with Borum his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4283 - 2005-03-31
recounted the history of the case, explaining that the court had repeatedly discussed with Borum his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4283 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
offense and enhancers. Such allocation is not required by statute or case law.” State v. Kleven, 2005 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59173 - 2011-01-24
offense and enhancers. Such allocation is not required by statute or case law.” State v. Kleven, 2005 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59173 - 2011-01-24
[PDF]
State v. Jeremy J. Mayotte
to the exclusionary rule applies to this case. No. 2005AP878-CR 5 By the Court.—Judgment and order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20905 - 2017-09-21
to the exclusionary rule applies to this case. No. 2005AP878-CR 5 By the Court.—Judgment and order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20905 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael Love
the evidence furnishes part of the context of the crime or is necessary to a full presentation of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8208 - 2017-09-19
the evidence furnishes part of the context of the crime or is necessary to a full presentation of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8208 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
. The sentence was within the maximum sentence Broesch faced and, given the facts of this case, there would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139096 - 2015-04-01
. The sentence was within the maximum sentence Broesch faced and, given the facts of this case, there would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139096 - 2015-04-01
CA Blank Order
, indicating that this court preferred to decide the case based on “the benefit of full briefing.” See Cierra
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132239 - 2014-12-22
, indicating that this court preferred to decide the case based on “the benefit of full briefing.” See Cierra
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132239 - 2014-12-22
COURT OF APPEALS
under the circumstances of this case. ¶8 Finally, Mejia argues that his sentence should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116919 - 2014-07-14
under the circumstances of this case. ¶8 Finally, Mejia argues that his sentence should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116919 - 2014-07-14
August Table of Unpublished Opinions
judicata, collateral estoppel or law of the case. Docket No. Title
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19617 - 2005-09-12
judicata, collateral estoppel or law of the case. Docket No. Title
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19617 - 2005-09-12
Sheila L. Davis v. Carey K. Davis
of the whole case ….” ¶7 The court determined that it would interpret the order based upon its plain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2589 - 2005-03-31
of the whole case ….” ¶7 The court determined that it would interpret the order based upon its plain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2589 - 2005-03-31