Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 72981 - 72990 of 77584 for judgment for u s.
Search results 72981 - 72990 of 77584 for judgment for u s.
State v. Mary H.
brief, arguing that “even though Mary H.’s rights were terminated, Don H., her husband in an intact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2183 - 2005-03-31
brief, arguing that “even though Mary H.’s rights were terminated, Don H., her husband in an intact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2183 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
’ property had “caused the adjacent property owner[s] hardships,” including “[r]eduction in enjoyment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1119148 - 2026-05-19
’ property had “caused the adjacent property owner[s] hardships,” including “[r]eduction in enjoyment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1119148 - 2026-05-19
COURT OF APPEALS
contributor to the three DNA profile[s] developed from the knife … to being a ‘possible’ [and] ‘minor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106677 - 2014-01-13
contributor to the three DNA profile[s] developed from the knife … to being a ‘possible’ [and] ‘minor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106677 - 2014-01-13
[PDF]
Grant County Department of Social Services v. Unified Board of Grant and Iowa Counties
. There was oral argument by Sheila S. Kelley. Respondent ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6245 - 2017-09-19
. There was oral argument by Sheila S. Kelley. Respondent ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6245 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Joseph Koch
name are written on the signature lines, each preceded by a /s/ and each described as “Borrower
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15837 - 2017-09-21
name are written on the signature lines, each preceded by a /s/ and each described as “Borrower
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15837 - 2017-09-21
Marjorie A. G. v. Dodge County Department of Human Services
the financial resources available for Scott []’s care. However, while it is necessary, it is not enough
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5196 - 2005-03-31
the financial resources available for Scott []’s care. However, while it is necessary, it is not enough
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5196 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
the evidence, viewed most favorably to the [S]tate and the commitment, is so insufficient in probative value
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98463 - 2014-09-15
the evidence, viewed most favorably to the [S]tate and the commitment, is so insufficient in probative value
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98463 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of Rights Form ‘lessen[s] the extent and degree of the colloquy otherwise required between the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45543 - 2010-01-12
of Rights Form ‘lessen[s] the extent and degree of the colloquy otherwise required between the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45543 - 2010-01-12
[PDF]
WI 49
, including the reinstatement rules, SCR 22.29 through 22.33. See S. Ct. Order 19-06, 19-07, 19-08, 19-09
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=373980 - 2021-06-04
, including the reinstatement rules, SCR 22.29 through 22.33. See S. Ct. Order 19-06, 19-07, 19-08, 19-09
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=373980 - 2021-06-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and summarily argue[d] that postconviction counsel was ineffective for failing to bring the claim[s] he now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1028958 - 2025-10-28
and summarily argue[d] that postconviction counsel was ineffective for failing to bring the claim[s] he now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1028958 - 2025-10-28