Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 731 - 740 of 6436 for dr.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of Robert. Dr. Braam, who is a licensed psychologist, concluded that Robert’s “Neurocognitive Disorder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989236 - 2025-07-30

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that he was experiencing them. At trial, Dr. Rawski testified that Kucharski’s account of the evening
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162280 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Randall Seltrecht v. Christine A. Bremer
on the claim against Dr. Hofbauer. She also told them, as recounted in her letter, “to seek the advice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11130 - 2017-09-19

State v. Justin F. W.
that a psychologist, Dr. Michael Spierer, could meet with Justin. By letter dated April 18, counsel for Justin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9002 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Julie L. Weber v. Angelene White
therapy, she was referred to Dr. George J. Hanacik Jr., for chiropractic treatment. ¶5 The Webers
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16727 - 2017-09-21

State v. Justin F. W.
that a psychologist, Dr. Michael Spierer, could meet with Justin. By letter dated April 18, counsel for Justin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9003 - 2005-03-31

Julie L. Weber v. Angelene White
was referred to Dr. George J. Hanacik Jr., for chiropractic treatment. ¶5 The Webers commenced this action
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16727 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Justin F. W.
that a psychologist, Dr. Michael Spierer, could meet with Justin. By letter dated April 18, counsel for Justin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9002 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Justin F. W.
that a psychologist, Dr. Michael Spierer, could meet with Justin. By letter dated April 18, counsel for Justin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9003 - 2017-09-19

Randall Seltrecht v. Christine A. Bremer
she wrote the next day, that the applicable statute of limitations had expired on the claim against Dr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11130 - 2005-03-31