Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 731 - 740 of 57152 for id.
Search results 731 - 740 of 57152 for id.
State v. Kenneth R. Metz
discretionary determinations may be findings of fact and conclusions of law. Id. We will not overturn findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4576 - 2005-03-31
discretionary determinations may be findings of fact and conclusions of law. Id. We will not overturn findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4576 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
suspicion to stop and probable cause to arrest at a refusal hearing. Id., ¶42. On appeal, Chiarelli
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150604 - 2017-09-21
suspicion to stop and probable cause to arrest at a refusal hearing. Id., ¶42. On appeal, Chiarelli
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150604 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth R. Metz
be findings of fact and conclusions of law. Id. We will not overturn findings of fact unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4576 - 2017-09-19
be findings of fact and conclusions of law. Id. We will not overturn findings of fact unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4576 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Marathon County v. Edward F.W.
) statutorily biased, (2) subjectively biased, or (3) objectively biased. See id. at 725-27. A juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2623 - 2017-09-19
) statutorily biased, (2) subjectively biased, or (3) objectively biased. See id. at 725-27. A juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2623 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to adjudicate the particular case before the court.” Id., ¶9. Put another way, the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010041 - 2025-09-16
to adjudicate the particular case before the court.” Id., ¶9. Put another way, the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010041 - 2025-09-16
COURT OF APPEALS
show that the court relied upon an unreasonable or unjustifiable basis for its sentence. Id., ¶¶17-18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30453 - 2007-10-01
show that the court relied upon an unreasonable or unjustifiable basis for its sentence. Id., ¶¶17-18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30453 - 2007-10-01
COURT OF APPEALS
of historical fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. Additionally, we defer to the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138608 - 2015-03-30
of historical fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. Additionally, we defer to the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138608 - 2015-03-30
District II/IV March 1, 2013 To: Hon. Anthony G. Milisauskas Circuit Court Judge Kenosha County C...
applies individually to each sentence, even when concurrent sentences are imposed at the same time. Id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93596 - 2014-04-16
applies individually to each sentence, even when concurrent sentences are imposed at the same time. Id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93596 - 2014-04-16
[PDF]
WI App 6
thereon.” Id. Upon making certain findings, including that the property was held permanently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205947 - 2018-02-12
thereon.” Id. Upon making certain findings, including that the property was held permanently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205947 - 2018-02-12
State v. Hayes Johnson
a presumption of prosecutorial vindictiveness. Id. at 95. The State petitioned for review of this decision
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17259 - 2005-03-31
a presumption of prosecutorial vindictiveness. Id. at 95. The State petitioned for review of this decision
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17259 - 2005-03-31