Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 731 - 740 of 59946 for quit claim deed.
Search results 731 - 740 of 59946 for quit claim deed.
James J. Mc Mahon v. Standard Bank and Trust Company
the property, via a quit-claim deed, to the trust which is the subject of this case. The Standard Bank
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9039 - 2005-03-31
the property, via a quit-claim deed, to the trust which is the subject of this case. The Standard Bank
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9039 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
James J. Mc Mahon v. Standard Bank and Trust Company
, via a quit-claim deed, to the trust which is the subject of this case. The Standard Bank and Trust
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9039 - 2017-09-19
, via a quit-claim deed, to the trust which is the subject of this case. The Standard Bank and Trust
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9039 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Frontsheet
a residential real estate transaction and a claim that the seller No. 2020AP225 2
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=641323 - 2023-06-19
a residential real estate transaction and a claim that the seller No. 2020AP225 2
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=641323 - 2023-06-19
[PDF]
Auer Park Corporation, Inc. v. Michael J. Derynda
deed. Auer Park claimed that it had obtained title to the strip through adverse possession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14187 - 2014-09-15
deed. Auer Park claimed that it had obtained title to the strip through adverse possession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14187 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
United Stone Corporation v. County of Waukesha
No. 95-3169 -2- remand the action for further proceedings to determine the claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9973 - 2017-09-19
No. 95-3169 -2- remand the action for further proceedings to determine the claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9973 - 2017-09-19
United Stone Corporation v. County of Waukesha
a prescriptive easement. We remand the action for further proceedings to determine the claim for an easement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9973 - 2005-03-31
a prescriptive easement. We remand the action for further proceedings to determine the claim for an easement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9973 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the Green County register of deeds. The Owners purchased lots on Proverbs Pass and constructed residences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114928 - 2017-09-21
in the Green County register of deeds. The Owners purchased lots on Proverbs Pass and constructed residences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114928 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of deeds. The Owners purchased lots on Proverbs Pass and constructed residences on the lots. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114928 - 2014-06-18
of deeds. The Owners purchased lots on Proverbs Pass and constructed residences on the lots. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114928 - 2014-06-18
[PDF]
Raymond B. Schaefer v. David D. Boldt
on alternative grounds: adverse possession and reformation of the Schaefers’ deed. Because we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4078 - 2017-09-20
on alternative grounds: adverse possession and reformation of the Schaefers’ deed. Because we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4078 - 2017-09-20
Raymond B. Schaefer v. David D. Boldt
possession and reformation of the Schaefers’ deed. Because we affirm the circuit court’s decision to award
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4078 - 2005-03-31
possession and reformation of the Schaefers’ deed. Because we affirm the circuit court’s decision to award
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4078 - 2005-03-31