Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 731 - 740 of 96742 for state case.
Search results 731 - 740 of 96742 for state case.
State v. Carolyn G.
. Appeal Nos. 02-0624, 02-0625 & 02-0626 Cir. Ct. Nos. 00 TP 330, 00 TP 331 & 00 TP 332 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5013 - 2005-03-31
. Appeal Nos. 02-0624, 02-0625 & 02-0626 Cir. Ct. Nos. 00 TP 330, 00 TP 331 & 00 TP 332 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5013 - 2005-03-31
State v. Carolyn G.
. Appeal Nos. 02-0624, 02-0625 & 02-0626 Cir. Ct. Nos. 00 TP 330, 00 TP 331 & 00 TP 332 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5012 - 2005-03-31
. Appeal Nos. 02-0624, 02-0625 & 02-0626 Cir. Ct. Nos. 00 TP 330, 00 TP 331 & 00 TP 332 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5012 - 2005-03-31
State v. Carolyn G.
. Appeal Nos. 02-0624, 02-0625 & 02-0626 Cir. Ct. Nos. 00 TP 330, 00 TP 331 & 00 TP 332 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5011 - 2005-03-31
. Appeal Nos. 02-0624, 02-0625 & 02-0626 Cir. Ct. Nos. 00 TP 330, 00 TP 331 & 00 TP 332 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5011 - 2005-03-31
State v. Patricia K.S.
Patricia’s and Philip’s case, conducted on August 7, 1995,[2] Patricia’s newly-appointed counsel stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10638 - 2005-03-31
Patricia’s and Philip’s case, conducted on August 7, 1995,[2] Patricia’s newly-appointed counsel stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10638 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Dannie Thomas
that they are to be treated as one. He cites State v. Tappa, 127 Wis.2d 155, 378 N.W.2d 883 (1985). That case actually
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12758 - 2017-09-21
that they are to be treated as one. He cites State v. Tappa, 127 Wis.2d 155, 378 N.W.2d 883 (1985). That case actually
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12758 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Tonya G.
is present. (c) In the case of a violation of a state law or a county, town or municipal ordinance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12939 - 2017-09-21
is present. (c) In the case of a violation of a state law or a county, town or municipal ordinance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12939 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Carlos Facundo
conclude that it did not affect the result of this case, because the cocaine was taken after the state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11557 - 2017-09-19
conclude that it did not affect the result of this case, because the cocaine was taken after the state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11557 - 2017-09-19
State v. Cedric Holze
allow possession for legal purposes in a prosecution such as the case at bar. In fact, the State had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6559 - 2005-03-31
allow possession for legal purposes in a prosecution such as the case at bar. In fact, the State had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6559 - 2005-03-31
State v. Julie Dixon
cases addressing whether a probation extension is appropriate: State v. Davis, 127 Wis.2d 486, 381 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13355 - 2005-03-31
cases addressing whether a probation extension is appropriate: State v. Davis, 127 Wis.2d 486, 381 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13355 - 2005-03-31
State v. Shawn Schulpius
the petition, State v. Schulpius, Case No. 00-0095 (order of March 14, 2000). After briefing, Schulpius
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16350 - 2005-03-31
the petition, State v. Schulpius, Case No. 00-0095 (order of March 14, 2000). After briefing, Schulpius
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16350 - 2005-03-31