Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7301 - 7310 of 91373 for police arresting judge 2 part.
Search results 7301 - 7310 of 91373 for police arresting judge 2 part.
COURT OF APPEALS
stemming from the initial FCC ex parte order are moot. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Jeffery and Karen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82187 - 2012-05-08
stemming from the initial FCC ex parte order are moot. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Jeffery and Karen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82187 - 2012-05-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
understand, claims of entrapment, police misconduct, unlawful parole seizure, unlawful arrest
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=526681 - 2022-06-01
understand, claims of entrapment, police misconduct, unlawful parole seizure, unlawful arrest
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=526681 - 2022-06-01
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - February 2015
(headquartered in Madison), which affirmed a La Crosse County Circuit Court decision, Judge Romona
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134567 - 2017-09-21
(headquartered in Madison), which affirmed a La Crosse County Circuit Court decision, Judge Romona
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134567 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2021-22). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=752844 - 2024-01-19
judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2021-22). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=752844 - 2024-01-19
COURT OF APPEALS
relief.[3] In this motion, he claimed the police did not have probable cause to arrest him; that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31859 - 2008-02-19
relief.[3] In this motion, he claimed the police did not have probable cause to arrest him; that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31859 - 2008-02-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(b) (2021-22). All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=848984 - 2024-09-17
is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(b) (2021-22). All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=848984 - 2024-09-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2024AP1560-CR 2 RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1 We affirm in part, reverse in part, and cause remanded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017721 - 2025-10-01
. No. 2024AP1560-CR 2 RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1 We affirm in part, reverse in part, and cause remanded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017721 - 2025-10-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2024AP1560-CR 2 RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1 We affirm in part, reverse in part, and cause remanded
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017721 - 2025-10-01
. No. 2024AP1560-CR 2 RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1 We affirm in part, reverse in part, and cause remanded
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017721 - 2025-10-01
[PDF]
State v. Anita Lusk
by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2), STATS. No. 98-2372-CR 2 conducting a Mann2 hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14394 - 2014-09-15
by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2), STATS. No. 98-2372-CR 2 conducting a Mann2 hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14394 - 2014-09-15
State v. Anita Lusk
)(b)4, Stats. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2), Stats. [2] State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14394 - 2005-03-31
)(b)4, Stats. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2), Stats. [2] State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14394 - 2005-03-31