Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7301 - 7310 of 74552 for public records.

[PDF] State v. William Faison
not erroneously exercise its sentencing discretion, because the lineup photos are not a part of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12576 - 2017-09-21

State v. Quintin D. L'Minggio
discretion to do. ¶15 As to protection of the public, the trial court alluded to L’Minggio’s long record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3973 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Quintin D. L'Minggio
past criminal record, placed undue weight on the fact that he was on parole at the time of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3973 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
the record. Trial counsel raised the cultural argument at sentencing, and the circuit court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57527 - 2010-12-06

[PDF] CA Blank Order
in receivership under Anchor Property Management pursuant to declarations that they are public nuisances. After
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194152 - 2017-09-21

Sauk County v. Marcus J. Gumz
at least sixty (60) days in advance of assembly. The ordinance applies to public or private property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4863 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Sauk County v. Marcus J. Gumz
for which must be made at least sixty (60) days in advance of assembly. The ordinance applies to public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4863 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
policy violates Wisconsin’s public records law? Does Wis. Stat. § 19.70 require the DOJ to correct
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186424 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] SC Table of Pending Cases - Added decision in 2014AP2813-CR, 2015AP207 and 2016AP923-W
policy violates Wisconsin’s public records law? Does Wis. Stat. § 19.70 require the DOJ to correct
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187327 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Donald J. Harman
or subversive to the public interest. Accordingly, we deny Harman's petition for reinstatement.1 Furthermore
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17562 - 2017-09-21