Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 73071 - 73080 of 78085 for restraining order/1000.

[PDF] CA-120Ts; Form Summary
the judgment or order appealed from was entered. Copies must be served upon: 1. Opposing counsel; 2. any
/formdisplay/CA-120T_summary.pdf?formNumber=CA-120T&formType=Summary&formatId=2&language=en - 2022-11-07

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 6, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
requested judgment ordering Ballard to remove all structures from her premises. Ballard counterclaimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28339 - 2007-03-05

COURT OF APPEALS
with discretion to “exercise reasonable control over the mode and order of interrogating witnesses and presenting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42188 - 2009-10-13

State v. Shalamar Bursinger
constructive (as opposed to actual) possession. In order to prove that Bursinger had possession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19778 - 2005-10-03

Samuels Recycling Company v. Continental Casualty Company
moved for relief from the orders dismissing its claims. The circuit court denied the motion and Samuels
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1233 - 2005-01-26

State v. John C. Jackson
detention of the individual in order to investigate further. See id. Questions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13455 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. William McCall
McCall to testify in order to fairly judge his guilt. No. 00-0170-CR 3 ¶6 The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2167 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. William S. Purdy
-examination. The trial court elected to control the proceedings in order to avoid undue delay and waste
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4006 - 2017-09-20

State v. Darnell Stevens
to locate the missing witness, and the court declined to order a further adjournment. The court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8502 - 2005-03-31

Kristine M. Downer-Beuthin v. John J. Beuthin
was $11,105.50. ¶11 On February 21, 2003, the trial court issued a decision and order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7208 - 2005-03-31