Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7311 - 7320 of 17239 for probate/1000.
Search results 7311 - 7320 of 17239 for probate/1000.
Patricia L. Grochowski v. Robert Larson
or intangible personal property for purposes of probate, the trial court's determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8902 - 2005-03-31
or intangible personal property for purposes of probate, the trial court's determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8902 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
to the charge. On May 26, 2011, he was convicted and sentenced to a term of three years' probation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87477 - 2012-09-24
to the charge. On May 26, 2011, he was convicted and sentenced to a term of three years' probation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87477 - 2012-09-24
[PDF]
State v. Tyree Goodrich
on eight years’ probation. Consistent with the joint recommendation, the court imposed concurrent three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7315 - 2017-09-20
on eight years’ probation. Consistent with the joint recommendation, the court imposed concurrent three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7315 - 2017-09-20
CA Blank Order
sentencing was withheld in favor of probation.[1] Harris’s appellate counsel has filed a no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136994 - 2015-03-10
sentencing was withheld in favor of probation.[1] Harris’s appellate counsel has filed a no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136994 - 2015-03-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. In the no-merit report, counsel explained Kaufman was on probation at the time of these offenses, his probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=665412 - 2023-06-07
. In the no-merit report, counsel explained Kaufman was on probation at the time of these offenses, his probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=665412 - 2023-06-07
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d 224, ¶17. ¶11 The court concluded that the case required imprisonment and that probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30271 - 2007-09-17
. 2d 224, ¶17. ¶11 The court concluded that the case required imprisonment and that probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30271 - 2007-09-17
[PDF]
NOTICE
and that probation was not an alternative, particularly in light of Zunac’s prior failure on supervision. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30271 - 2014-09-15
and that probation was not an alternative, particularly in light of Zunac’s prior failure on supervision. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30271 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
of Corr., Div. of Probation & Parole, 215 Wis. 2d 1, 12, 572 N.W.2d 864 (Ct. App. 1997). Rather
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102236 - 2013-09-19
of Corr., Div. of Probation & Parole, 215 Wis. 2d 1, 12, 572 N.W.2d 864 (Ct. App. 1997). Rather
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102236 - 2013-09-19
State v. Craig Chenal
and sentenced him to two years’ probation, with 120 days jail as a condition of probation. The court ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3745 - 2005-03-31
and sentenced him to two years’ probation, with 120 days jail as a condition of probation. The court ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3745 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of extended supervision, and placed her on three years of probation with one year in the House of Correction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59395 - 2011-01-26
of extended supervision, and placed her on three years of probation with one year in the House of Correction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59395 - 2011-01-26