Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 73191 - 73200 of 82994 for simple case.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
in this case, Braatz must show that, if he had been aware of the victim’s request for a prison sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1129962 - 2026-06-11

CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96625 - 2013-05-06

State v. Henry James Brookshire
, Blakely is not applicable. When, as in Brookshire’s case, the court exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18306 - 2005-05-31

State v. Landris T. Jines
and he admitted to negotiating concessions in another case in exchange for his testimony against Jines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18671 - 2005-06-22

[PDF] CA Blank Order
plea. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181387 - 2017-09-21

Sharman M. Smith v. Gypsum Supply Company
note that this case was originally assigned to Judge George A.W. Northrup, who granted an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11711 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109962 - 2014-04-08

CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition and we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95065 - 2013-04-02

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 13, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
, as well as the plea questionnaire. Id., ¶¶53-54. ¶6 In this case, the circuit court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28100 - 2007-02-12

Jodine Y. Taylor v. Terry L. Taylor
) and to ensure a fair and equitable financial arrangement between the parties in each individual case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6907 - 2005-03-31