Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7321 - 7330 of 19113 for citi.

COURT OF APPEALS
awards is very limited. Milwaukee Prof’l Firefighters v. City of Milwaukee, 78 Wis. 2d 1, 21, 253 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46519 - 2010-02-01

[PDF] State v. John D. Meindl
is superfluous. Lake City Corp. v. City of Mequon, 207 Wis. 2d 155, 162, 558 N.W.2d 100 (1997). Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18687 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. City of Independence, 2016 WI App 94, ¶18, 372 Wis. 2d 802, 889 N.W.2d 186. We will assume, without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=479444 - 2022-02-03

[PDF] NOTICE
or the City of Janesville operations. ¶4 Mule Hill argues that the court erred in the final sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30392 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
Moore testified as follows. He was on patrol within the city limits of the City of Boscobel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27165 - 2014-09-15

State v. James C. Berlin
are publicly or privately owned ¼.” Section 346.61, Stats. In City of Kenosha v. Phillips, 142 Wis.2d 549
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9373 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
review a circuit court’s decision on a motion to dismiss de novo. See Northbrook Wis., LLC v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121637 - 2014-09-17

[PDF] WI App 43
the strong presumption favoring disclosure.” Hempel v. City of Baraboo, 2005 WI 120, ¶63, 284 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214381 - 2018-08-13

[PDF] NOTICE
of discretion” and instead refer to the “erroneous exercise of discretion.” City of Brookfield v. Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36009 - 2014-09-15

State v. Marquis D. Rosenburg
, history, context, subject matter, and purpose. Id.; see also Voss v. City of Middleton, 162 Wis. 2d 737
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17030 - 2005-03-31