Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 73201 - 73210 of 82994 for simple case.
Search results 73201 - 73210 of 82994 for simple case.
State v. Joseph C. Clark
deny these motions based on the amount of time the case had been pending and the extensive arrangements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14406 - 2005-03-31
deny these motions based on the amount of time the case had been pending and the extensive arrangements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14406 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Under the circumstances of the cases, the court’s decision does not “shock public sentiment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109564 - 2017-09-21
. Under the circumstances of the cases, the court’s decision does not “shock public sentiment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109564 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the circumstances of the case. In addition to the issues discussed by counsel, we note that Hussein waived
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=751644 - 2024-01-18
the circumstances of the case. In addition to the issues discussed by counsel, we note that Hussein waived
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=751644 - 2024-01-18
State v. Henry James Brookshire
, Blakely is not applicable. When, as in Brookshire’s case, the court exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18298 - 2005-05-31
, Blakely is not applicable. When, as in Brookshire’s case, the court exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18298 - 2005-05-31
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
to support a claim of res judicata, collateral estoppel or law of the case. Docket
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32699 - 2008-05-12
to support a claim of res judicata, collateral estoppel or law of the case. Docket
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32699 - 2008-05-12
CA Blank Order
. The sentence was within the maximum sentence Broesch faced and, given the facts of this case, there would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139096 - 2015-04-01
. The sentence was within the maximum sentence Broesch faced and, given the facts of this case, there would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139096 - 2015-04-01
CA Blank Order
not be repeated here. See State v. Gallion, 2004 WI 42, ¶¶17-51, 270 Wis. 2d 535, 678 N.W.2d 197. In this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129294 - 2014-11-16
not be repeated here. See State v. Gallion, 2004 WI 42, ¶¶17-51, 270 Wis. 2d 535, 678 N.W.2d 197. In this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129294 - 2014-11-16
COURT OF APPEALS
not apply the Escalona-Naranjo bar in this case, we need not review the claim of ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102975 - 2013-10-14
not apply the Escalona-Naranjo bar in this case, we need not review the claim of ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102975 - 2013-10-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=446012 - 2021-10-27
conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=446012 - 2021-10-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
No. 2023AP1539 2 that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=843684 - 2024-08-29
No. 2023AP1539 2 that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=843684 - 2024-08-29