Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7331 - 7340 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.

Annette Slocum v. Robert Parsley
stay away from their joint property line. The court could reasonably infer that the assault occurred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7975 - 2005-03-31

Libbie Pesek v. Lincoln County
Envtl. Decade v. Joint Comm. for Review of Admin. Rules, 73 Wis.2d 234, 236, 243 N.W.2d 497, 498 (1976
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9543 - 2005-03-31

Libbie Pesek v. Lincoln County Board of Supervisors
Envtl. Decade v. Joint Comm. for Review of Admin. Rules, 73 Wis.2d 234, 236, 243 N.W.2d 497, 498 (1976
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9798 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
presented a joint sentence recommendation of a withheld sentence and ten years’ probation, with one year
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110395 - 2014-04-14

State v. Kawane A. Weaver
counsel had moved for a mistrial in the joint trial. We conclude that Weaver has not met the prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13479 - 2005-03-31

Libbie Pesek v. Lincoln County
Envtl. Decade v. Joint Comm. for Review of Admin. Rules, 73 Wis.2d 234, 236, 243 N.W.2d 497, 498 (1976
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9544 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Supreme Court rule petition 20-08 supporting memo
the record for an adequate period of time. After two years, motion and appeal time limits will have
/supreme/docs/2008memo.pdf - 2020-12-10

[MS WORD] IW-1610: Petition for Protection or Services (Chapter 48) - Indian Child Welfare Act
) Child in temporary physical custody? |_| No |_| Yes Date: Time: |_| a.m. |_| p.m
/formdisplay/IW-1610.doc?formNumber=IW-1610&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2025-11-19

Shane C. Reinhart v. Peggy S. Reinhart
child custody and placement. ¶3 The trial took place over three days in February
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15884 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
‘into custody’ by a law enforcement officer” and Paul was not “in custody” as required by WIS. STAT. § 51.15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71380 - 2014-09-15