Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7331 - 7340 of 50071 for our.
Search results 7331 - 7340 of 50071 for our.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was ineffective for failing to correct the court’s mistakes. With regard to Betton’s guilty plea, our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=973880 - 2025-06-24
was ineffective for failing to correct the court’s mistakes. With regard to Betton’s guilty plea, our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=973880 - 2025-06-24
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=961376 - 2025-05-28
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=961376 - 2025-05-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Beard pled guilty to fleeing and two counts of retail theft, our review of the Record and of counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983042 - 2025-07-16
Beard pled guilty to fleeing and two counts of retail theft, our review of the Record and of counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983042 - 2025-07-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
objected. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254441 - 2020-02-18
objected. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254441 - 2020-02-18
State v. Eric J. Yelk
that there is no arguable basis to challenge Yelk’s guilty and no contest pleas. Our independent review of the records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11853 - 2005-03-31
that there is no arguable basis to challenge Yelk’s guilty and no contest pleas. Our independent review of the records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11853 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
157 (1994). In Escalona-Naranjo, our supreme court held that “a motion under sec. 974.06 could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48243 - 2010-03-22
157 (1994). In Escalona-Naranjo, our supreme court held that “a motion under sec. 974.06 could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48243 - 2010-03-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
will not reverse unless there is no reasonable basis for the court’s exercise of discretion. Id. Moreover, our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=178981 - 2017-09-21
will not reverse unless there is no reasonable basis for the court’s exercise of discretion. Id. Moreover, our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=178981 - 2017-09-21
State v. Eric J. Yelk
that there is no arguable basis to challenge Yelk’s guilty and no contest pleas. Our independent review of the records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11851 - 2005-03-31
that there is no arguable basis to challenge Yelk’s guilty and no contest pleas. Our independent review of the records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11851 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
times with Long. Long indicated satisfaction with his attorney’s representation. Nothing in our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=732696 - 2023-11-29
times with Long. Long indicated satisfaction with his attorney’s representation. Nothing in our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=732696 - 2023-11-29
WI App 23 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP1414 Complete Title of...
109, ¶6, 244 Wis. 2d 229, 629 N.W.2d 12. In our review, we will reject an unreasonable construction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107401 - 2014-02-25
109, ¶6, 244 Wis. 2d 229, 629 N.W.2d 12. In our review, we will reject an unreasonable construction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107401 - 2014-02-25