Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 73351 - 73360 of 77351 for judgment for u s.
Search results 73351 - 73360 of 77351 for judgment for u s.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
or “this court will summarily reverse the judgment or order appealed from.” See id.; see also WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237853 - 2019-03-19
or “this court will summarily reverse the judgment or order appealed from.” See id.; see also WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237853 - 2019-03-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the judgment is summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Attorney Timothy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027898 - 2025-10-28
that the judgment is summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Attorney Timothy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027898 - 2025-10-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in such proceedings is ninety days from entry of the judgment or order. WIS. STAT. §§ 808.04(1); 974.06(6). Hill’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1063139 - 2026-01-15
in such proceedings is ninety days from entry of the judgment or order. WIS. STAT. §§ 808.04(1); 974.06(6). Hill’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1063139 - 2026-01-15
State v. Michael J. Rice
. GARTZKE, P.J.[1] Michael Rice appeals from an order amending his judgment of conviction for disorderly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9120 - 2005-03-31
. GARTZKE, P.J.[1] Michael Rice appeals from an order amending his judgment of conviction for disorderly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9120 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that “the court shall not substitute its judgment for that of [LIRC] as to the weight of the evidence on any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1062702 - 2026-01-15
that “the court shall not substitute its judgment for that of [LIRC] as to the weight of the evidence on any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1062702 - 2026-01-15
[PDF]
State v. Carl E. Cunningham
modification on a judgment entered following the revocation of his probation. We affirm for the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6654 - 2017-09-20
modification on a judgment entered following the revocation of his probation. We affirm for the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6654 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for appeal. IT IS ORDERED that the judgments of conviction are summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218408 - 2018-08-28
for appeal. IT IS ORDERED that the judgments of conviction are summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218408 - 2018-08-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record discloses no other potential issue for appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138012 - 2017-09-21
of the record discloses no other potential issue for appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138012 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 48
of the effective date of the order or judgment of the other jurisdiction constitutes misconduct. 2 SCR 22.22(3
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51211 - 2014-09-15
of the effective date of the order or judgment of the other jurisdiction constitutes misconduct. 2 SCR 22.22(3
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51211 - 2014-09-15
Shannon G. Poirier v. Paula M. Poirier
. In the divorce judgment, Shannon was awarded custody of the four children and Paula was ordered to pay him twenty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11128 - 2005-03-31
. In the divorce judgment, Shannon was awarded custody of the four children and Paula was ordered to pay him twenty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11128 - 2005-03-31