Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7341 - 7350 of 92086 for 1.
Search results 7341 - 7350 of 92086 for 1.
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Before Wedemeyer, Fine and Kessler, JJ. No. 2006AP2034-CR 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Quincy Lee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30036 - 2014-09-15
. Before Wedemeyer, Fine and Kessler, JJ. No. 2006AP2034-CR 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Quincy Lee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30036 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Casey J. Shelton
for Rock County: JAMES P. DALEY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 VERGERONT, P.J. 1 Casey J. Shelton appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3930 - 2017-09-20
for Rock County: JAMES P. DALEY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 VERGERONT, P.J. 1 Casey J. Shelton appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3930 - 2017-09-20
State v. Marty S. Madeiros
. ¶1 ROGGENSACK, J.[1] Marty Madeiros appeals his conviction for operating a motor vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3069 - 2005-03-31
. ¶1 ROGGENSACK, J.[1] Marty Madeiros appeals his conviction for operating a motor vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3069 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). Counsel for Thomas C. Macemon has filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2019-20),1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=513148 - 2022-04-27
). Counsel for Thomas C. Macemon has filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2019-20),1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=513148 - 2022-04-27
[PDF]
Marsha M. Machotka v. William J. Bartlett
. Before Vergeront, P.J., Dykman and Deininger, JJ. ¶1 DYKMAN, J. Marsha Machotka appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3567 - 2017-09-19
. Before Vergeront, P.J., Dykman and Deininger, JJ. ¶1 DYKMAN, J. Marsha Machotka appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3567 - 2017-09-19
State v. Stephan E. Yoder, Jr.
rendered § 346.67(1)(c), Stats., inapplicable. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8812 - 2005-03-31
rendered § 346.67(1)(c), Stats., inapplicable. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8812 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
(2011-12).[1] We summarily affirm. On today’s date, we also issue an order in a related case, appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116658 - 2014-07-06
(2011-12).[1] We summarily affirm. On today’s date, we also issue an order in a related case, appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116658 - 2014-07-06
[PDF]
NOTICE
and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. The appellants, landowners in the Town of Rome, appeal from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33092 - 2014-09-15
and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. The appellants, landowners in the Town of Rome, appeal from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33092 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. Affirmed. Before Fine, Kessler and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Reymond Gollier, Jr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54139 - 2010-09-07
. Affirmed. Before Fine, Kessler and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Reymond Gollier, Jr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54139 - 2010-09-07
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mark E. Sostarich
granted. ¶1 PER CURIAM. We review a referee's report recommending that Attorney Mark E
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24518 - 2017-09-21
granted. ¶1 PER CURIAM. We review a referee's report recommending that Attorney Mark E
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24518 - 2017-09-21