Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7341 - 7350 of 74479 for public records.
Search results 7341 - 7350 of 74479 for public records.
COURT OF APPEALS
, and that he had no prior criminal record. ¶4 The State recommended prison time in an unspecified amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47199 - 2010-02-22
, and that he had no prior criminal record. ¶4 The State recommended prison time in an unspecified amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47199 - 2010-02-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
family support, and that he had no prior criminal record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47199 - 2014-09-15
family support, and that he had no prior criminal record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47199 - 2014-09-15
Wisconsin Court System - Headlines archive
Records Management Committee Public access to justice Access to Justice Commission Wisconsin Commission
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=25&year=2007
Records Management Committee Public access to justice Access to Justice Commission Wisconsin Commission
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=25&year=2007
COURT OF APPEALS
recording relating to his arrest. For the reasons we explain below, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Engel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35007 - 2008-12-22
recording relating to his arrest. For the reasons we explain below, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Engel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35007 - 2008-12-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the police department’s failure to preserve the video recording relating to his arrest. For the reasons we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35007 - 2014-09-15
of the police department’s failure to preserve the video recording relating to his arrest. For the reasons we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35007 - 2014-09-15
State v. Justin Hawkins
not done so. Based on our review of the no merit report and the record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11221 - 2005-03-31
not done so. Based on our review of the no merit report and the record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11221 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reviewing the record and counsel’s reports, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110218 - 2017-09-21
reviewing the record and counsel’s reports, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110218 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
and prior record and the need to protect the public. See State v. Harris, 119 Wis. 2d 612, 623, 350 N.W
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92740 - 2014-09-15
and prior record and the need to protect the public. See State v. Harris, 119 Wis. 2d 612, 623, 350 N.W
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92740 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not done so. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977166 - 2025-07-01
not done so. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977166 - 2025-07-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169243 - 2017-09-21
. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169243 - 2017-09-21