Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 73401 - 73410 of 77351 for judgment for u s.
Search results 73401 - 73410 of 77351 for judgment for u s.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sentence. See WIS. STAT. § 48.415(9m)(a). The circuit court properly employed summary judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143688 - 2017-09-21
sentence. See WIS. STAT. § 48.415(9m)(a). The circuit court properly employed summary judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143688 - 2017-09-21
State v. Briann Joseph Block
for count three. Block did not timely appeal from this judgment. ¶3 In 1996, Block
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19091 - 2005-07-25
for count three. Block did not timely appeal from this judgment. ¶3 In 1996, Block
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19091 - 2005-07-25
State v. Duane R. Bull
and the judgment of conviction. In Bull’s Wis. Stat. § 974.06 motion, filed in August 2000, he raised a number
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3679 - 2005-03-31
and the judgment of conviction. In Bull’s Wis. Stat. § 974.06 motion, filed in August 2000, he raised a number
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3679 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
issue for appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment is summarily affirmed. WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105819 - 2017-09-21
issue for appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment is summarily affirmed. WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105819 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
for appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment is summarily affirmed. Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102963 - 2013-10-14
for appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment is summarily affirmed. Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102963 - 2013-10-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the judgments of conviction are summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307476 - 2020-11-25
that the judgments of conviction are summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307476 - 2020-11-25
Adrian Lomax v. Warden
judgment; and (4) the evidence was such that it might reasonably make the order or determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9081 - 2005-03-31
judgment; and (4) the evidence was such that it might reasonably make the order or determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9081 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the judgments of conviction and order denying postconviction relief are summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=922348 - 2025-03-06
that the judgments of conviction and order denying postconviction relief are summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=922348 - 2025-03-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the judgment of conviction and order denying Scott’s postconviction motion are summarily affirmed, pursuant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182073 - 2017-09-21
that the judgment of conviction and order denying Scott’s postconviction motion are summarily affirmed, pursuant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182073 - 2017-09-21
State v. Leroy Moore
the motion, and this court affirmed the judgment of conviction and the postconviction order. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25070 - 2006-05-08
the motion, and this court affirmed the judgment of conviction and the postconviction order. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25070 - 2006-05-08