Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 73461 - 73470 of 77551 for judgment for u s.
Search results 73461 - 73470 of 77551 for judgment for u s.
[PDF]
NOTICE
–534. Davidson’s appellate rights expired some time in 2001, meaning his judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61890 - 2014-09-15
–534. Davidson’s appellate rights expired some time in 2001, meaning his judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61890 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CR-227; Plea Questionnaire / Waiver of Rights POL
This form does not replace the need for an interpreter, any colloquies mandated by law, or the
/formdisplay/CR-227_pl.pdf?formNumber=CR-227&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=pl - 2022-06-09
This form does not replace the need for an interpreter, any colloquies mandated by law, or the
/formdisplay/CR-227_pl.pdf?formNumber=CR-227&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=pl - 2022-06-09
[MS WORD]
CR-227: Plea Questionnaire / Waiver of Rights
. Número de caso This form does not replace the need for an interpreter, any colloquies mandated by
/formdisplay/CR-227_es.doc?formNumber=CR-227&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=es - 2023-02-22
. Número de caso This form does not replace the need for an interpreter, any colloquies mandated by
/formdisplay/CR-227_es.doc?formNumber=CR-227&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=es - 2023-02-22
[PDF]
State v. John Tomlinson, Jr.
, as defined in s. 941.295 (4); or any other device or instrumentality which, in the manner it is used
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16444 - 2017-09-21
, as defined in s. 941.295 (4); or any other device or instrumentality which, in the manner it is used
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16444 - 2017-09-21
State v. Dennis J. Kivioja
is affirmed. ¶67 SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, CHIEF JUSTICE (dissenting). I agree with the majority opinion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17309 - 2005-03-31
is affirmed. ¶67 SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, CHIEF JUSTICE (dissenting). I agree with the majority opinion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17309 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
s. pocan and karen e. christenson, Judges.[1] Affirmed.[2] ¶1 BRENNAN, J.[3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57680 - 2011-01-02
s. pocan and karen e. christenson, Judges.[1] Affirmed.[2] ¶1 BRENNAN, J.[3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57680 - 2011-01-02
State v. Dennis J. Kivioja
is affirmed. ¶67 SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, CHIEF JUSTICE (dissenting). I agree with the majority opinion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17310 - 2005-03-31
is affirmed. ¶67 SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, CHIEF JUSTICE (dissenting). I agree with the majority opinion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17310 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
contends that “[t]he statutory presumption[s] alert[] courts to the importance of consistency for a child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=535872 - 2022-06-22
contends that “[t]he statutory presumption[s] alert[] courts to the importance of consistency for a child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=535872 - 2022-06-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with a serious crime, “[s]pecial circumstances may lessen the importance of” the State’s interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1062401 - 2026-01-13
with a serious crime, “[s]pecial circumstances may lessen the importance of” the State’s interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1062401 - 2026-01-13
[PDF]
WI App 71
[s].” ¶30 We agree with the DHS that the Olson court did not hold or otherwise indicate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039828 - 2026-01-26
[s].” ¶30 We agree with the DHS that the Olson court did not hold or otherwise indicate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039828 - 2026-01-26