Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7351 - 7360 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 7351 - 7360 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
State v. Sammy J. Dickey
, Dickey filed a motion to suppress the results of the blood test; he argued that neither Wisconsin’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3615 - 2005-03-31
, Dickey filed a motion to suppress the results of the blood test; he argued that neither Wisconsin’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3615 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kenneth D. Paulson
, P.J., and Hoover, J. PER CURIAM. Kenneth Paulson, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14598 - 2005-03-31
, P.J., and Hoover, J. PER CURIAM. Kenneth Paulson, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14598 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
County of Marquette v. Martin E. Jacobs
. Jacobs filed a motion to suppress the results of the field sobriety tests on the ground
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15308 - 2017-09-21
. Jacobs filed a motion to suppress the results of the field sobriety tests on the ground
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15308 - 2017-09-21
State v. Reginold B. Trussell
claims that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence because the officer: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15732 - 2005-03-31
claims that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence because the officer: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15732 - 2005-03-31
Shane C. Reinhart v. Peggy S. Reinhart
child custody and placement. ¶3 The trial took place over three days in February
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15884 - 2005-03-31
child custody and placement. ¶3 The trial took place over three days in February
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15884 - 2005-03-31
[MS WORD]
JD-1745: Dispositional Order (Delinquent)
of restrictive custodial treatment, and placement in the serious juvenile offender program is not appropriate
/formdisplay/JD-1745.doc?formNumber=JD-1745&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2025-07-10
of restrictive custodial treatment, and placement in the serious juvenile offender program is not appropriate
/formdisplay/JD-1745.doc?formNumber=JD-1745&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2025-07-10
State v. Sally A. Drew
was in custody when she gave her statement to the police. The State points out that she came to the police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6869 - 2005-03-31
was in custody when she gave her statement to the police. The State points out that she came to the police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6869 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
‘into custody’ by a law enforcement officer” and Paul was not “in custody” as required by Wis. Stat. § 51.15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71380 - 2011-09-26
‘into custody’ by a law enforcement officer” and Paul was not “in custody” as required by Wis. Stat. § 51.15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71380 - 2011-09-26
Shane C. Reinhart v. Peggy S. Reinhart
child custody and placement. ¶3 The trial took place over three days in February
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16179 - 2005-03-31
child custody and placement. ¶3 The trial took place over three days in February
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16179 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
‘into custody’ by a law enforcement officer” and Paul was not “in custody” as required by WIS. STAT. § 51.15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71380 - 2014-09-15
‘into custody’ by a law enforcement officer” and Paul was not “in custody” as required by WIS. STAT. § 51.15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71380 - 2014-09-15