Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7351 - 7360 of 58592 for speedy trial.
Search results 7351 - 7360 of 58592 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Anthony D. Turner
contends that he received ineffective assistance from trial counsel. We conclude that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12893 - 2017-09-21
contends that he received ineffective assistance from trial counsel. We conclude that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12893 - 2017-09-21
Robert Peaslee v. David Peaslee
by David Peaslee and Karen Peaslee (David). They argue that the trial court placed improper restrictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2212 - 2005-03-31
by David Peaslee and Karen Peaslee (David). They argue that the trial court placed improper restrictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2212 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Vanessa Henningfield v. Judith Fischer
was excessive. We conclude that the trial court’s award was a proper exercise of its discretion and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14813 - 2017-09-21
was excessive. We conclude that the trial court’s award was a proper exercise of its discretion and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14813 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Ronald S. Schilling v. Sandra Sweney
was well within the trial court’s discretion. We therefore affirm. BACKGROUND On July 22, 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14288 - 2014-09-15
was well within the trial court’s discretion. We therefore affirm. BACKGROUND On July 22, 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14288 - 2014-09-15
State v. Ralph Axelson
appeals from an order denying his § 974.06, Stats., motion for postconviction relief. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8296 - 2005-03-31
appeals from an order denying his § 974.06, Stats., motion for postconviction relief. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8296 - 2005-03-31
Mary Sevcik v. Secura Insurance
that the trial court improperly exercised its discretion when it denied the motion, we reverse the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5921 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court improperly exercised its discretion when it denied the motion, we reverse the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5921 - 2005-03-31
Ronald S. Schilling v. Sandra Sweney
discussed below, we conclude that the dismissal was well within the trial court’s discretion. We therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14288 - 2005-03-31
discussed below, we conclude that the dismissal was well within the trial court’s discretion. We therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14288 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Mary Sevcik v. Secura Insurance
. Because No. 02-3138 2 we conclude that the trial court improperly exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5921 - 2017-09-19
. Because No. 02-3138 2 we conclude that the trial court improperly exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5921 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Ricky L. Amrine
. The trial court departed from the sentencing guidelines, imposing maximum, consecutive sentences on each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8444 - 2017-09-19
. The trial court departed from the sentencing guidelines, imposing maximum, consecutive sentences on each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8444 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Ricky L. Amrine
. The trial court departed from the sentencing guidelines, imposing maximum, consecutive sentences on each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8443 - 2017-09-19
. The trial court departed from the sentencing guidelines, imposing maximum, consecutive sentences on each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8443 - 2017-09-19