Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 73521 - 73530 of 77551 for judgment for u s.
Search results 73521 - 73530 of 77551 for judgment for u s.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court sentenced him to a ten-year prison term. This court affirmed that judgment. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168990 - 2017-09-21
court sentenced him to a ten-year prison term. This court affirmed that judgment. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168990 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. We affirmed the judgment and an order denying Givens’ motion for sentence reduction. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37302 - 2009-07-14
. We affirmed the judgment and an order denying Givens’ motion for sentence reduction. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37302 - 2009-07-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
its own judgment predicated on alleged errors of fact.” Coram Nobis, BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY 388
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=618565 - 2023-02-07
its own judgment predicated on alleged errors of fact.” Coram Nobis, BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY 388
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=618565 - 2023-02-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
issue for appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgments are summarily affirmed. WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115638 - 2017-09-21
issue for appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgments are summarily affirmed. WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115638 - 2017-09-21
Threshermen's Mutual Insurance Company v. State
, this court cannot give the required weight to the administrative agency's value judgment based upon its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10536 - 2005-03-31
, this court cannot give the required weight to the administrative agency's value judgment based upon its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10536 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
of the record discloses no other issues of arguable merit. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119179 - 2014-08-11
of the record discloses no other issues of arguable merit. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119179 - 2014-08-11
COURT OF APPEALS
to the ultimate judgment and the factual finding to which the alleged factual error is directed must not have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49296 - 2010-04-26
to the ultimate judgment and the factual finding to which the alleged factual error is directed must not have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49296 - 2010-04-26
Albert Winfrey v. Gordon A. Abrahamson
will and not its judgment; and (4) the evidence was such that it might reasonably make the order or determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8029 - 2005-03-31
will and not its judgment; and (4) the evidence was such that it might reasonably make the order or determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8029 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in such proceedings is ninety days from entry of the judgment or order. WIS. STAT. §§ 808.04(1); 974.06(6). Hill’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1063139 - 2026-01-15
in such proceedings is ninety days from entry of the judgment or order. WIS. STAT. §§ 808.04(1); 974.06(6). Hill’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1063139 - 2026-01-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in such proceedings is ninety days from entry of the judgment or order. WIS. STAT. §§ 808.04(1); 974.06(6). Hill’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1063139 - 2026-01-15
in such proceedings is ninety days from entry of the judgment or order. WIS. STAT. §§ 808.04(1); 974.06(6). Hill’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1063139 - 2026-01-15