Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7361 - 7370 of 68466 for did.
Search results 7361 - 7370 of 68466 for did.
State v. Thomas M. Fischer
to an evidentiary blood test. Fischer contends that he did not refuse the blood test but merely exercised his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14460 - 2005-03-31
to an evidentiary blood test. Fischer contends that he did not refuse the blood test but merely exercised his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14460 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
or extended supervision. ¶4 Gronseth’s attorney did not object to this order. The court later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253589 - 2020-02-06
or extended supervision. ¶4 Gronseth’s attorney did not object to this order. The court later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253589 - 2020-02-06
State v. Darrin D. Grosskopf
the defense did not exist in order to sustain a finding of first-degree intentional homicide. Section 940.01
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6184 - 2005-03-31
the defense did not exist in order to sustain a finding of first-degree intentional homicide. Section 940.01
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6184 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Lawrence E. Diez v. Oneida County Child Support Agency
. 1 The court did not recall receiving the letter, and it was not in the court’s file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15191 - 2017-09-21
. 1 The court did not recall receiving the letter, and it was not in the court’s file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15191 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
and the defendant’s allegations, that the colloquy was deficient and the defendant did not know or understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65362 - 2011-06-07
and the defendant’s allegations, that the colloquy was deficient and the defendant did not know or understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65362 - 2011-06-07
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Williams did not appeal.3 ¶3 In 2008, this court released Cherry, which discussed the on-the- record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61697 - 2014-09-15
. Williams did not appeal.3 ¶3 In 2008, this court released Cherry, which discussed the on-the- record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61697 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
attorney nor the circuit court adequately explained the elements of his crime, and he therefore did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47143 - 2014-09-15
attorney nor the circuit court adequately explained the elements of his crime, and he therefore did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47143 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
circuit court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. We conclude that it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=969385 - 2025-06-12
circuit court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. We conclude that it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=969385 - 2025-06-12
COURT OF APPEALS
did not address the State’s additional argument that Cameron validly consented to the search. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31622 - 2008-01-22
did not address the State’s additional argument that Cameron validly consented to the search. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31622 - 2008-01-22
COURT OF APPEALS
court properly exercised its discretion when it did not exclude the late filed responses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32175 - 2008-03-25
court properly exercised its discretion when it did not exclude the late filed responses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32175 - 2008-03-25