Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7361 - 7370 of 76901 for judgment for u s.

[PDF] State v. Shoua Vang
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Portage County: THOMAS T. FLUGAUR, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6906 - 2017-09-20

State v. Shoua Vang
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Portage County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6906 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Daniel L. Gaulrapp
from a judgment Full Name JUDGE COURT: Circuit Lower Court. COUNTY: Dane (If "Special" JUDGE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10688 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Kenosha County: CHAD G. KERKMAN, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197979 - 2017-10-18

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, V. NICHOLAS D. HALL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175290 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] P.J.H. Company v. Board of Review of the City of Wauwatosa
the 1995 and 1996 assessments of P.J.H.’s office building, which is located at 2323 North Mayfair Road
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13003 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] P.J.H. Company v. Board of Review of the City of Wauwatosa
the 1995 and 1996 assessments of P.J.H.’s office building, which is located at 2323 North Mayfair Road
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13004 - 2017-09-21

P.J.H. Company v. Board of Review of the City of Wauwatosa
upheld the 1995 and 1996 assessments of P.J.H.’s office building, which is located at 2323 North Mayfair
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13004 - 2014-04-07

P.J.H. Company v. Board of Review of the City of Wauwatosa
upheld the 1995 and 1996 assessments of P.J.H.’s office building, which is located at 2323 North Mayfair
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13003 - 2005-03-31

State v. Kevin L. C.
., Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14737 - 2005-03-31